2016
DOI: 10.1093/jiel/jgw072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Will the EU’s Proposal Concerning an Investment Court System for CETA and TTIP Lead to Enforceable Awards?—The Limits of Modifying the ICSID Convention and the Nature of Investment Arbitration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Inter se modification of the ICSID convention needs to meet the conditions stipulated under article 41 of the 1969 VCLT (39) (40). However, the "ICSID Appeals Facility" paper missed addressing the question of whether inserting a mechanism for appellate review as inter se modification contradict with requirements of article 41 of 1969 VCLT (41). It is noteworthy that there are some views in favour of consistency between the requirement of the 1969 VCLT and the foundation of an appeal review mechanism as inter se modification, especially in terms of the purpose and objectives of the ICSID convention(8) (41).…”
Section: An Appellate Mechanism Is a Premature Issue But Not An Exclu...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Inter se modification of the ICSID convention needs to meet the conditions stipulated under article 41 of the 1969 VCLT (39) (40). However, the "ICSID Appeals Facility" paper missed addressing the question of whether inserting a mechanism for appellate review as inter se modification contradict with requirements of article 41 of 1969 VCLT (41). It is noteworthy that there are some views in favour of consistency between the requirement of the 1969 VCLT and the foundation of an appeal review mechanism as inter se modification, especially in terms of the purpose and objectives of the ICSID convention(8) (41).…”
Section: An Appellate Mechanism Is a Premature Issue But Not An Exclu...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the "ICSID Appeals Facility" paper missed addressing the question of whether inserting a mechanism for appellate review as inter se modification contradict with requirements of article 41 of 1969 VCLT (41). It is noteworthy that there are some views in favour of consistency between the requirement of the 1969 VCLT and the foundation of an appeal review mechanism as inter se modification, especially in terms of the purpose and objectives of the ICSID convention(8) (41). Ultimately, ICSID decided against adopting an Appeals Facility, with most Administrative Council members thinking it would be premature to seek to develop such a mechanism at that point(42).…”
Section: An Appellate Mechanism Is a Premature Issue But Not An Exclu...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ICS would provide greater transparency, consistency, and legitimacy than the ISDS system. The ICS could potentially be considered an inter se modification to the ICSID Convention, which would allow countries to opt-in to the ICS without having to renegotiate the entire treaty (6). SDGs seek to put an end to poverty, safeguard the environment, and guarantee peace and prosperity.…”
Section: The Relationship Between the Ics And Icsid System In The Lig...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This would overcome a variety of practical obstacles for current litigant investors and respondent states, whereby there can be in dispute over the appropriate venue for arbitration, the appointment of appropriate arbitrators and the norms that will determine the outcome of any dispute. 63 However, there seems likely to be hostility from the CJEU to such an initiative, which detracts from the powers of the former. The matter is currently the subject of a reference by Belgium.…”
Section: The Content Of Investment Treatiesmentioning
confidence: 99%