2008
DOI: 10.1007/s12152-007-9004-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Will Working Mothers’ Brains Explode? The Popular New Genre of Neurosexism

Abstract: A number of recent popular books about gender differences have drawn on the neuroscientific literature to support the claim that certain psychological differences between the sexes are 'hard-wired'. This article highlights some of the ethical implications that arise from both factual and conceptual errors propagated by such books.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
25
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Here males are described as typically having greater skills in rule-governed, systemising activities whilst typical females are described as having superior empathy and general emotional sensitivity. Hence, males are more likely to be on the autistic spectrum as they are more predisposed to autistic traits.. Whilst the EMB theory describes biological factors as a strong determinant of risk of ASC, Fine (2008) argues that the theory underplays the influence of non-biological factors. Debates around the aetiology of ASCs continue, and there is also mounting evidence that the androcentric nature of assessment instruments, together with the self-confirming bias of gendered expectations about typical presentations within services, are maintaining this gender difference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here males are described as typically having greater skills in rule-governed, systemising activities whilst typical females are described as having superior empathy and general emotional sensitivity. Hence, males are more likely to be on the autistic spectrum as they are more predisposed to autistic traits.. Whilst the EMB theory describes biological factors as a strong determinant of risk of ASC, Fine (2008) argues that the theory underplays the influence of non-biological factors. Debates around the aetiology of ASCs continue, and there is also mounting evidence that the androcentric nature of assessment instruments, together with the self-confirming bias of gendered expectations about typical presentations within services, are maintaining this gender difference.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cordelia Fine, a neuroscientist who now refers to herself as a 'critical neuroscientist', argues that Brizendine's The Female Brain and other publications like it are examples of ''neurosexism''. She writes, ''unfortunately, scientific accuracy and common sense are often casualties in the ugly rush to cloak old-fashioned sexism in the respectable and authoritative language of neuroscience'' (Fine, 2008). Fine fails to give us guidance, however, on how best to respond to or critically evaluate the more scientific and careful work being conducted by sex-difference researchers such as Kimura. Anne Fausto-Sterling, a biologist, has authored two significant books that take a feminist perspective on biological theories about men and women.…”
Section: Feminist Approaches To Sex-based Neuroscientific Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Young & Balaban, 2006, p. 634). Other reviews and discussions by neuroscientists and feminists have been equally if not more critical (see, for example, Fine 2008).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through the use of suspect interpretation of data, and the publication of these interpretations in popular science media, Cordelia Fine has argued that gender stereotypes are being propagated through the misrepresentation of the science, through (among other things) assigning excessive significance to or drawing over broad inferences from research data [5].…”
Section: Introduction: (Mis) Understanding Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%