1966
DOI: 10.1016/0011-7471(66)90004-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind-driven ocean circulation—Part 2. Numerical solutions of the non-linear problem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
60
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
4
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, since the removal is presumed a priori in models with a Sverdrup interior, these models form only a partial understanding of what controls the circulation strength. Veronis (1966) demonstrates that as vorticity advection becomes strong relative to the frictional removal of vorticity, the inertial terms become dominant in regions outside the boundary current. More recent work has demonstrated that these inertially-dominated or inertial runaway solutions are ubiquitous in the wind-driven single-gyre ocean model with constant viscosity; time-dependent and steady-state calculations with differing boundary conditions all demonstrate this behavior (e.g., Ierley and Sheremet, 1995;Sheremet et al, 1995Sheremet et al, , 1997.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, since the removal is presumed a priori in models with a Sverdrup interior, these models form only a partial understanding of what controls the circulation strength. Veronis (1966) demonstrates that as vorticity advection becomes strong relative to the frictional removal of vorticity, the inertial terms become dominant in regions outside the boundary current. More recent work has demonstrated that these inertially-dominated or inertial runaway solutions are ubiquitous in the wind-driven single-gyre ocean model with constant viscosity; time-dependent and steady-state calculations with differing boundary conditions all demonstrate this behavior (e.g., Ierley and Sheremet, 1995;Sheremet et al, 1995Sheremet et al, , 1997.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This variability could be due to changes in the external atmospheric forcing or to the system's intrinsic instability and nonlinearity. The latter explanation was first put forward by Veronis (1963Veronis ( , 1966, but the former has enjoyed greater popularity in the oceanographic community until fairly recently. A systematic application of the methods of dynamical systems theory to the wind-driven circulation problem has yielded several physical mechanisms for the observed lowfrequency variability, on the time scale of several months to several years .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we assume the external flow field F(x) is given by the double-gyre model which is often used to describe large scale recirculation in the ocean [16]:…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%