1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0038-092x(99)00026-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind Energy Potential of Coastal Eritrea: An Analysis of Sparse Wind Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, the long-term AWS is used to represent a wind resource, which has the following two advantages: (i) a one-parameter distribution of wind speed can be readily derived from the AWS to represent the approximate variation of wind conditions at the concerned site; and (ii) the resource strength of the site can be readily related to a wind map that represents the wind resources over a region in terms of their estimated AWS. In the context of the first advantage (stated above), it is important to note that both the Weibull and Rayleigh distribution are known to provide an acceptable description of wind speed probability [22][23][24][25] (although the former is more popular and, in general, more accurate). The Rayleigh distribution is a one-parameter model, and we exploit this characteristic to derive an approximate wind speed distribution from the "average wind speed" information; where a unique value of the distribution parameter can be determined from a given value of the mean of the distribution.…”
Section: Geographical Variation Of Wind Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, the long-term AWS is used to represent a wind resource, which has the following two advantages: (i) a one-parameter distribution of wind speed can be readily derived from the AWS to represent the approximate variation of wind conditions at the concerned site; and (ii) the resource strength of the site can be readily related to a wind map that represents the wind resources over a region in terms of their estimated AWS. In the context of the first advantage (stated above), it is important to note that both the Weibull and Rayleigh distribution are known to provide an acceptable description of wind speed probability [22][23][24][25] (although the former is more popular and, in general, more accurate). The Rayleigh distribution is a one-parameter model, and we exploit this characteristic to derive an approximate wind speed distribution from the "average wind speed" information; where a unique value of the distribution parameter can be determined from a given value of the mean of the distribution.…”
Section: Geographical Variation Of Wind Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been concluded by Garcia et al that the two-parameter Weibull probability model fits the real wind data better than the lognormal, gamma and Rayleigh models [3,5,6]. In other words, most wind speed distribution characteristics at any site can be described by two parameters: the shape parameter k, and the scale parameter C. The fraction of time duration that the wind blows at speed V is thus determined by:…”
Section: Theoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selection of the right machine for the right site plays a capital role in the success of the project. Depending on the Weibull scale and shape parameters, it is possible to identify the rated speed suitable for a particular wind regime [4,5,13]. Selecting the appropriate machine to a given site leads to …”
Section: Figs 4: Comparison Of Power Curves For Different Rated Wind mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our purpose is to obtain a compact description of these variables in a vertical range in the low atmosphere, not well researched to date. The use of the lognormal distribution in wind speed analysis is infrequent (Bogardi and Matyasovszky, 1996;Garcı´a et al, 1998), the most widely used distribution for fitting wind speed observations in time and space being the Weibull distribution (Ramachandra et al, 1997;Rosen et al, 1999;Torres et al, 1999;Jaramillo et al, 2004b;Vogiatzis et al, 2004). A simpler version, the Rayleigh distribution, is also occasionally considered (Ulgen and Hepbasli, 2002;Kose et al, 2004;Akpinar and Akpinar, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%