2021
DOI: 10.1007/s13344-021-0028-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind Farm Support Vessel Extreme Roll Assessment While Docking in the Bohai Sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Where 1{A} 1 if A is true, while it is 0 if not. As shown in (Wang, 2001;Bak et al, 2013;Naess and Karpa, 2015a;Naess and Karpa, 2015b;Gaidai et al, 2016;Jian et al, 2018;Gaidai et al, 2019a;Gaidai et al, 2019b;Xu et al, 2019b;Gaidai et al, 2020;Xu et al, 2021)…”
Section: Acer Methodsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Where 1{A} 1 if A is true, while it is 0 if not. As shown in (Wang, 2001;Bak et al, 2013;Naess and Karpa, 2015a;Naess and Karpa, 2015b;Gaidai et al, 2016;Jian et al, 2018;Gaidai et al, 2019a;Gaidai et al, 2019b;Xu et al, 2019b;Gaidai et al, 2020;Xu et al, 2021)…”
Section: Acer Methodsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…It is seen from Figure 5 left that ACER2D fits different Gumbel copula to the measured data, and there is an inherent mismatch with original data (indicated by red dots) due to a particular copula choice; for more details on the ACER2D method, see Refs. [8–43]. The bivariate nondimensional failure point indicated by the star in Figure 5 was chosen purely as an example.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By comparing it to methods that have been previously benchmarked in various applications, the unique methodology presented in this study has been verified. [ 8–43 ] Note that the novel Gaidai‐Fu‐Xing (GFX) method is MDOF (multi‐degree of freedom), while average conditional exceedance rate 2 dimensional (ACER2D) is only limited to 2 degrees of freedom (2DOF) (two dimensions); moreover, ACER2D does not provide confidence intervals (CIs), while the new GFX method can.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since this paper is focused mainly on post-processing of direct Monte Carlo (MC) simulation results, there is no focus on the simulation length and CPU time, since there is no comparison to a direct full MC simulation (as in e.g. 21,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] ), but rather a comparison with CPU time efficient analytical solution.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%