2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2017.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind-induced dynamic amplification effects on the shallow foundation of a horizontal-axis wind turbine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is observed that the static contact pressure was not homogeneously distributed but exhibited large values on the downwind side and relatively small values on the upwind side. is finding is broadly in agreement with the monitored results and those reported in the literature [9]. e abnormal contact pressures at individual points in Case #1 appear due to stress concentrations when the eccentricity of the foundation is relatively small.…”
Section: Static Contactsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is observed that the static contact pressure was not homogeneously distributed but exhibited large values on the downwind side and relatively small values on the upwind side. is finding is broadly in agreement with the monitored results and those reported in the literature [9]. e abnormal contact pressures at individual points in Case #1 appear due to stress concentrations when the eccentricity of the foundation is relatively small.…”
Section: Static Contactsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…e steel reinforcement cage is linked to the concrete using the embedded technique [30]. Coulomb's friction law with a friction coefficient of 0.35 is applied to simulate the tangential behavior between the foundation and the subsoil [4,9]. e contact in the normal direction at the interface between the foundation and the subsoil is considered to be a hard contact.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared with the nonlinear elastic model, the elastoplastic model is considered more reliable to reflect the essential characteristics of the rock and soil. Normally, it is difficult to utilize the elastoplastic model to analyze the engineering field due to the complicated parameters [11][12][13][14][15][16]. Furthermore, the mathematical expression of a nonlinear constitutive model is relatively simple, and the physical meaning of parameters is clear and easy to determine based on the conventional triaxial test.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%