In this paper, the authors analyse numerical and experimental results concerning either dry and saturated granular flows under steady, simple shear conditions. A new constitutive model is introduced, on the base of the mixture theory, according to which granular and liquid phases are considered separately. The constitutive relationship refers to the Representative Elementary Volume and assumes the mean values of all kinematic variables, of both granular and liquid phases, to coincide. For the two phases, a parallel scheme is chosen. As far as the granular contribution is concerned, the authors employ an already conceived constitutive model where the critical state concept and the kinetic theory of granular gases are merged, and in which the granular temperature plays the role of state variable for the material. Under saturated conditions, the new model accounts for granular-liquid coupling effects. In fact, the liquid viscosity results to be a function of granular concentration, whereas the evolution of granular temperature is influenced by the liquid molecular viscosity. The model is validated against numerical results and critically discussed. For sufficiently small values of concentration, the transition from Newtonian to Bagnoldian regime, for increasing values of strain rate, is correctly reproduced.

During heating (loading characterised by a progressive increase in strain rate) and cooling (loading characterised by a progressive decrease in strain rate) numerical tests, performed by using Discrete Element codes, granular materials experience phase transition phenomena, named in this paper ‘dry liquefaction’ (when from solid the material starts behaving like a fluid) and ‘dry resolidification’ (freezing, when the material from fluid starts behaving like a solid). The aim of this paper consists in reproducing phase transition phenomena by using a strain hardening visco‐elastic‐plastic model based on the critical state concept and kinetic theories of granular gases. The authors demonstrate that crucial is the role of isotropic softening/hardening, which describes the size of the elastic domain and the capability of the solid skeleton of storing elastic energy according to permanent force chains. The main ingredients of the model are: (i) the additivity of quasi‐static and collisional stresses, (ii) the energy balance equation governing the evolution of the granular temperature, interpreted this latter as an additional internal variable for the system for the collisional contribution, (iii) the mixed isotropic and kinematic hardening characterising the quasi‐static incremental constitutive relationship. The model has been both calibrated and validated on Discrete Element Method (DEM) numerical results, obtained by testing dry assemblies of monodisperse spheres under true triaxial loading conditions.

No abstract

The current effort towards the progressive switch from carbon‐based to renewable energy production is leading to a relevant spreading of both on‐ and off‐shore wind turbine towers. Regarding reinforced concrete shallow foundations of onshore wind turbine steel towers, possible reductions of reinforcement may increase their sustainability, speed of erection, and competitiveness. The article presents the results of an experimental program carried out at Politecnico di Milano concerning both cyclic and monotonic loading, simulating extreme wind conditions on 1:15 scaled models of wind turbine steel towers connected by stud bolt adapters to reinforced concrete shallow foundations embedded in a sandy soil. Three couples of foundation specimens were tested with different reinforcement layouts: (a) similar to current praxis, (b) without shear reinforcement, and (c) without shear reinforcement and with 50% of ordinary steel rebars replaced by steel fibers. Additional vertical loads were added to the small‐scale models in order to ensure similarity in terms of stresses. The test results allowed to (i) characterize the mechanical behavior of the foundation element considering soil‐structure interaction under both service and ultimate load conditions, (ii) assess the foundation failure mode, (iii) highlight the role of each typology of reinforcing bars forming the cage, and (iv) provide hints for the optimization of these latter.

No abstract