2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2012.04.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind-induced response and excitation characteristics of an inclined cable model in the critical Reynolds number range

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1. More information about the testing was previously given in [8,9]. In short it should be noted that the model could oscillate in two perpendicular planes (denoted sway and heave; see Fig.…”
Section: Wind Tunnel Tests' Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1. More information about the testing was previously given in [8,9]. In short it should be noted that the model could oscillate in two perpendicular planes (denoted sway and heave; see Fig.…”
Section: Wind Tunnel Tests' Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A dedicated study that attempted to address similarities between the two phenomena [7] was confined to static models and the comparison was limited to the assessment of the static lift that can be produced in different dry configurations. As a matter of fact the exciting force during dry galloping motion, which could be central to a better understanding, has rarely been recorded and analysed [8,9]. This paper describes a series of large-scale wind tunnel tests which capture subtle forcing details of the dry galloping phenomenon.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electronic pressure-scanning module converts them to high-level electronic signals. This system is a globally proven equipment for wind tunnel experiments in the construction, civil, and aerospace fields [22][23][24][25]. This electronic pressure-scanning module can accurately measure unsteady pressure signals within a small margin of error.…”
Section: Experimental Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average value of the structural response reflects the action effect of mean wind (the equivalent static wind) to a certain degree, whereas the standard deviation indicates the fluctuating effect of wind. The standard deviation of the structural response under the fluctuating wind velocity with a certain assurance rate is usually taken as the design value of fluctuating response in practical engineering (Jakobsen [22]). Thus the distribution and variation laws of means and standard deviations of the structural responses are taken as the main indices in analysis.…”
Section: Analytical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%