2020
DOI: 10.1177/0309524x20972115
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind power generation forecast by coupling numerical weather prediction model and gradient boosting machines in Yahyalı wind power plant

Abstract: Forecasting of the wind speed and power generation for a wind farm has always been quite challenging and has importance in terms of balancing the electricity grid and preventing energy imbalance penalties. This study focuses on creating a hybrid model that uses both numerical weather prediction model and gradient boosting machines (GBM) for wind power generation forecast. Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model with a low spatial resolution is used to increase temporal resolutions of the computed new or e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Barque et al (2018), using the atmospheric variable forecast data obtained from the NWP model and the historical power generation data of the related power plant, improved the performance of WPGF made with gradient boosted trees by 17%. Özen et al (2021) proposed a hybrid WPG forecast by coupling the outputs of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model which uses FNL/GDAS data as input with a gradient boosting machine (GBM). In this study, the atmospheric variables extracted from the four grid points surrounding a wind farm were used to train the proposed model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Barque et al (2018), using the atmospheric variable forecast data obtained from the NWP model and the historical power generation data of the related power plant, improved the performance of WPGF made with gradient boosted trees by 17%. Özen et al (2021) proposed a hybrid WPG forecast by coupling the outputs of the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model which uses FNL/GDAS data as input with a gradient boosting machine (GBM). In this study, the atmospheric variables extracted from the four grid points surrounding a wind farm were used to train the proposed model.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Okumus and Dinler (2016) proposed a wind speed forecasting model for 1 hour ahead by using the combination of adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and feed-forward artificial neural network on three different sites and in four different months of the year 2014 and they got better results than these models’ individual forecasts. Also, Özen et al (2021), compared day-ahead wind power forecast made with a well-tuned WRF model that has the high spatial resolution for a wind power plant on a complex site with a hybrid system that was proposed in the study. By coupling low-resolution WRF model outputs with gradient boosting machine method, in a study in which it was suggested that the downscaling of physical models should be made with a machine learning model, this method outperformed the physical method both in terms of computational time and accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have found that combinations of datasets and forecasting methods can improve wind power and wind speed predictions. In [84] and [85], machine learning models were used to improve WRF wind power and wind speed forecasts. To the best of the authors' knowledge, however, prior work has not analyzed the effectiveness of combining all three aforementioned data sources using machine learning methods.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pang et al explored the impact of other environmental variables using Shapley values and found that turbulence intensity, air density, and wind direction moderately impacted power output [86]. Özen et al included multiple WRF output variables as input to a power prediction model, however the importance of variables other than wind speeds was ambiguous due to the use of multiple wind speed variables at various heights [84]. This study further demonstrates that wind speed measurements alone are not sufficient for highly accurate wind power prediction.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%