2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind power generation probabilistic modeling using ensemble learning techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent papers addressing wind power forecasts could be broadly classified into 5 categories: papers focused on how to increase NWP accuracy [4][5][6][7][8], good-practice prediction guidelines [9][10][11], comparisons of accuracy across prediction models [12][13][14][15], hybrid and ensemble methods [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27], and conventional methods improved by, among other things, preprocessing [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. At this point, clear distinction should be made between hybrid, ensemble and improved models.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Recent papers addressing wind power forecasts could be broadly classified into 5 categories: papers focused on how to increase NWP accuracy [4][5][6][7][8], good-practice prediction guidelines [9][10][11], comparisons of accuracy across prediction models [12][13][14][15], hybrid and ensemble methods [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27], and conventional methods improved by, among other things, preprocessing [28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35]. At this point, clear distinction should be made between hybrid, ensemble and improved models.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hybridization [16][17][18][19][20][21] and parallelization [22][23][24][25][26][27] of prediction models use datarefining and error compensation, respectively, as an approach to maximize prediction accuracy. The most common bases for hybrid models in recent literature are ANNs [17][18][19]21] due to their generalization ability, while the most common hybrid add ons would be single optimization methods [16,18,20,21].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition to the prediction accuracy, the ET method has less training and testing time than the other two methods. Banik et al (2020), used Boosting, Gradient Boosting and Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) methods as predictors, outliers were removed in the data set consisting of hourly data from 2014, and the relationship between wind power and meteorological parameters was determined with the Pearson correlation heat map. According to the results, a strong correlation was found between wind power and wind speed, wind direction, temperature and humidity, and other parameters were not included in the model.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%