2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2003.09.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wind tunnel dispersion modelling some recent and not so recent achievements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The latter distribution is however also used to assess relationships between concentration percentiles and fluctuation intensity (see Sect. 3.2) and for i > 2 it does compare better with observations than (5).…”
Section: Scaling and Analysis Of Datamentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The latter distribution is however also used to assess relationships between concentration percentiles and fluctuation intensity (see Sect. 3.2) and for i > 2 it does compare better with observations than (5).…”
Section: Scaling and Analysis Of Datamentioning
confidence: 68%
“…This hybrid approach, often referred to as the 'C-FD-E approach' (Hangan, 1999;Robins, 2003), combines the advantages of the two techniques, establishing a reciprocal feedback.…”
Section: Cfd Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This dynamic similarity was widely used by Cermak [3] at special boundary-layer wind tunnel at Colorado State University where stable stratified flow and scale ratios from 1:5000 to 1:50 000 were performed. As reported in [4] at such scales many of the similarity conditions normally applied to the simulation of flow over complex terrain cannot be satisfied. Nevertheless, acceptable agreement between laboratory and field measurements is reported.…”
Section: Theoretical Assessment Of Flow Regimementioning
confidence: 98%