WINDII airglow observations of wave superposition and the possible association with historical “bright nights”

Abstract

Longitudinal variations of airglow emission rate are prominent in all midlatitude nighttime O(1S) lower thermospheric data obtained with the Wind Imaging Interferometer (WINDII) on the Upper Atmosphere Research Satellite (UARS). The pattern generally appears as a combination of zonal waves 1, 2, 3, and 4 whose phases propagate at different rates. Sudden localized enhancements of 2 to 4 days duration are sometimes evident, reaching vertically integrated emission rates of 400 R, a factor of 10 higher than minimum values for the same day. These are found to occur when the four wave components come into the same phase at one longitude. It is shown that these highly localized longitudinal maxima are consistent with the historical phenomena known as “bright nights” in which the surroundings of human dark night observers were seen to be illuminated by this enhanced airglow.

Reducing Variability and Removing Natural Light from Nighttime Satellite Imagery: A Case Study Using the VIIRS DNB

“…First, airglow itself is highly variable. In addition to long-term variations that are related to the solar cycle [12], airglow also changes with the seasons [13], and even on quite short time scales [14]. Second, satellite sensors with a wide swath observe Earth at variable nadir angles θ n .…”

Linking Solar Minimum, Space Weather, and Night Sky Brightness

“…Satellite observations suggest historical bright nights are the result of zonal wave superposition. 7 Walker, Krisciunas, and others have correlated observed variations in night sky brightness with prior changes in EUV from the Sun as measured by the 10.7cm (2.8 GHz) solar flux5,6. The hypothesis is, changes in photoionization on the Earth's day-side produce subsequent variable night time airglow by re-radiation from atoms and molecules in a complex chemical environment.…”

Equatorial auroral records reveal dynamics of the paleo-West Pacific geomagnetic anomaly

“…Rose (35) obtained a visual sensation with 100 photons • s −1 . Using an 8 mm pupil for the eye and 2 arcmin for a pixel, it can be calculated that the photon flux required to stimulate a physical sensation is 200 Rayleigh (36). Under the same illumination condition, only a brightness greater than 200 Rayleigh can be perceived by the eye at other wavelengths.…”