2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.cja.2020.12.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wing optimization of propeller aircraft based on actuator disc method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The pressure condition of the CFD actuator disc is directly relevant to the axial velocity distribution, whilst the tangential velocity distribution can be obtained by applying an angular velocity to the CFD actuator disc [24,25]. The wakefield can be quickly obtained through the above methods, and the ultimate goal is to obtain the inflow velocity of the lower propeller, namely, the axial and tangential velocities.…”
Section: Original and Optimized Crp Blade Shape Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pressure condition of the CFD actuator disc is directly relevant to the axial velocity distribution, whilst the tangential velocity distribution can be obtained by applying an angular velocity to the CFD actuator disc [24,25]. The wakefield can be quickly obtained through the above methods, and the ultimate goal is to obtain the inflow velocity of the lower propeller, namely, the axial and tangential velocities.…”
Section: Original and Optimized Crp Blade Shape Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulations of the propeller/wing interference could, in general, be divided into two main techniques. The first type was used to simulate the steady-state flow, which included the multiple reference frame (MRF) technique [32] and the actuator disk model [33], also known as the virtual blade model [34]. The other set of methods involved transient flow simulations, that is to state the methods considered the motion of the propeller at each time step, which contained the sliding mesh method (SMM) [28,35] and the overset mesh method (OMM) [36].…”
Section: Grid Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%