2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2015.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wing weight model for conceptual design of nonplanar configurations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Distributing the load between the aft and the fore wing in the BW results in a different moment distribution. The box wing has been shown to offer a lower bending moment and shear force which can relieve constraints in the design of multifunctional composites for the skins, spars, stringers and ribs of the wing [62]. In terms of aerodynamics effects, the induced drag can be reduced by up to 20% compared to conventional wings because of the higher aspect ratio and Oswald efficiency [60].…”
Section: Slender Wingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Distributing the load between the aft and the fore wing in the BW results in a different moment distribution. The box wing has been shown to offer a lower bending moment and shear force which can relieve constraints in the design of multifunctional composites for the skins, spars, stringers and ribs of the wing [62]. In terms of aerodynamics effects, the induced drag can be reduced by up to 20% compared to conventional wings because of the higher aspect ratio and Oswald efficiency [60].…”
Section: Slender Wingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The box wing can be designed to be slightly heavier or lighter than the conventional wing depending on the optimisation parameters. The BW was sized assuming that the aerodynamic load was equally distributed between the fore and the aft wing as per the biplane theory [62]. The two wing surfaces were sized to be of equal surface area, and their total surface area to be equal to that of the conventional wing.…”
Section: Slender Wingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• in [23], which is based on a multidisciplinary optimization framework implementing the equivalent beam finite element model described in [24] to evaluate wing mass.…”
Section: State Of the Art Of Box-wing Structural Mass Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies have been performed in mass models for conceptual design of conventional wings. Some developed wing mass estimation models for commercial and transport aircraft [2,5] and others for more unconventional configurations, such as nonplannar configurations [6,3,7] or high speed transport [8]. However, very few studies have focused on morphing wings.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%