2019
DOI: 10.2514/1.c034978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wingtip-Mounted Propellers: Aerodynamic Analysis of Interaction Effects and Comparison with Conventional Layout

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
53
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
8
53
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A prime example is the tipmounted propeller, that promises significant aerodynamic benefits due to integration synergies. A recent comprehensive experimental study by the authors [2] discussed the aerodynamic interaction effects for wingtip-mounted tractor propellers, and confirmed the potential aerodynamic benefit compared to a conventional propeller-wing layout in case of inboard-up rotation. The results complemented previous work [3,4] and recent research related to the NASA X-57 Maxwell [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…A prime example is the tipmounted propeller, that promises significant aerodynamic benefits due to integration synergies. A recent comprehensive experimental study by the authors [2] discussed the aerodynamic interaction effects for wingtip-mounted tractor propellers, and confirmed the potential aerodynamic benefit compared to a conventional propeller-wing layout in case of inboard-up rotation. The results complemented previous work [3,4] and recent research related to the NASA X-57 Maxwell [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…In all cases, the secondary system enhances the aerodynamic and/or propulsive performance of the aircraft. For example, the tip-mounted propulsors decrease the lift-induced drag of the wing, effectively increasing the equivalent aspect ratio or span efficiency of the wing [35]. The leading-edge propellers can increase the maximum lift coefficient of the wing [32], leading to a significant increase in wing loading [23,38].…”
Section: A Powertrain Architecture Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…And secondly because, even though several turboelectric aircraft design studies have been performed [13,18,30,31], there is still a large uncertainty regarding the benefits of such aircraft, especially due to the lack of propulsion-airframe integration studies. While the aerodynamic benefits of novel propulsion-system layouts such as leading-edge distributed propulsion [32], over-the-wing propulsion [33], under-the-wing propulsion [13], boundary-layer ingestion [34], or tip-mounted propulsion [35] have been studied at subsystem level, it is still unclear which of these configurations leads to the greatest benefit at aircraft level. Although such propulsion systems do not necessarily need a hybrid-electric powertrain [36], many radical aircraft configurations with improved propulsion-airframe integration are only viable when combined with HEP, and thus the overall benefit is highly dependent on the maturity of the powertrain components [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At low thrust settings, on the other hand, the trends are less clear. While some studies predict a decrease in span efficiency [29], others show an increase in span efficiency due to improved swirl recovery [52]. Since these effects cannot be quantified with the information available in the preliminary sizing phase, the change in span efficiency is neglected.…”
Section: Estimation Of ∆C L and ∆C Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The predictions are also compared to the experimental data of Sinnige et al [52], to check whether the model is accurate for other propeller configurations. These experiments studied a single tractor propeller mounted on a low-aspect-ratio wing.…”
Section: Verification Of the Aero-propulsive Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%