2019
DOI: 10.31235/osf.io/vjae6
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Winners and Losers from a Commodities-for-Manufactures Trade Boom

Abstract: A recent boom in commodities-for-manufactures trade between China and other developing countries has led to much concern about the losers from rising import competition in manufacturing, but little attention on the winners from growing Chinese demand for commodities. Using census data for Brazil, we find that local labour markets more affected by Chinese import competition experienced slower growth in manufacturing wages between 2000 and 2010. However, we observe faster wage growth in locations benefiting fr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
120
0
7

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
3
120
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…and 15.1%, respectively. Exports were mostly of agricultural and extractive products, whereas imports were mostly from manufactured goods (Costa et al, 2016 in Latin America, including Brazil. They find that among married women, the largest labor force reservoir in these economies, the labor participation of skilled workers is more responsive to changes in demand than that of unskilled workers, with the elasticities for skilled workers in this groups being around 20-30% larger than for the unskilled.…”
Section: Commodity Boommentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…and 15.1%, respectively. Exports were mostly of agricultural and extractive products, whereas imports were mostly from manufactured goods (Costa et al, 2016 in Latin America, including Brazil. They find that among married women, the largest labor force reservoir in these economies, the labor participation of skilled workers is more responsive to changes in demand than that of unskilled workers, with the elasticities for skilled workers in this groups being around 20-30% larger than for the unskilled.…”
Section: Commodity Boommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is evidence of differential impacts across regions based on their initial basket of industries. Costa et al (2016) uses these differences to investigate the impact of the surge in China's import penetration and expanded demand for some Brazilian products. Using data from the Brazilian Census representative of the whole economy, they show that local labor markets 12 at the 80th percentile of exposure to increased demand experienced a 0.93 p.p.…”
Section: Commodity Boommentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Section 2 shows that countries that benefited from the commodity boom in South America experienced stronger growth and much deeper reduction in inequality during the 2000s compared with the net commodity importers in Central America and Mexico.These developments motivate the question of what was the role of the commodity boom in the reduction in inequality in the 2000s? Evidence from Brazil shows that booming demand for commodities led to broad-based wage gains in commodity-rich regions(Costa, Garred, and Pessoa 2016) and sectors (Adao 2015). This type of mechanism reduced between-region and between-sector wage inequality, as winning sectors and regions in Brazil had lower initial average wages.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This term captures the substitution between US export products and their competitors, with higher levels of T j st raising demand for US exports. 8 The final term in the export equation is the total imports by j from other exporters…”
Section: Adh-style Ivsmentioning
confidence: 99%