2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-05915-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Winter peaks in web-based public inquiry into epistaxis

Abstract: Purpose Epistaxis represents the most frequent ear, nose, throat-related emergency symptom. Seasonal variation in epistaxis incidence, with peaks during winter months, is widely accepted, although the literature itself remains inconclusive. The objective of this study was to evaluate public inquiry into nose bleeding, by considering Google-based search query frequency on "Epistaxis"-related search terms and to assess possible seasonal variations globally. Results Graphical representation revealed seasonal vari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(61 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, our analysis provided further evidence that GT-data from larger countries were more reliable. This was in alignment to results of previous studies [ 9 , 10 ]. Again, we point out the importance of reliability assessment of data retrieved using GT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, our analysis provided further evidence that GT-data from larger countries were more reliable. This was in alignment to results of previous studies [ 9 , 10 ]. Again, we point out the importance of reliability assessment of data retrieved using GT.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…We have previously shown that data from countries with less inhabitants show lower reliability compared to higher populated countries [ 9 , 10 ]. We aimed to determine the reliability of GT-data which were assessed on seven consecutive days as mentioned above using the intraclass correlation coefficient (Tables 1 , 2 ) (Supplementary Tables 2–5).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations