Wireless Coexistence and Spectrum Sensing in Industrial Internet of Things: An Experimental Study

Abstract

The adoption of dense wireless sensor networks in industrial plants is mandatorily paired with the development of methods and tools for connectivity prediction. These are needed to certify the quality (or reliability) of the network information flow in industrial scenarios which are typically characterized by harsh propagation conditions. Connectivity prediction must account for the possible coexistence of heterogeneous radio-access technologies, as part of the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) paradigm, and easily allow postlayout validation steps. The goal of this paper is to provide a practical evaluation of relevant coexistence problems that may occur between industrial networks employing standards such as WirelessHART IEC 62591, IEEE 802.15.4, and IEEE 802.11. A number of coexistence scenarios are experimentally tested using different radio platforms. For each case, experimental results are analyzed to assess tolerable interference levels and sensitivity thresholds for different configurations of channel overlapping. Finally, the problem of over-the-air spectrum sensing is investigated in real scenarios with heterogeneous industrial networks to enable a cognitive resource allocation that avoids intolerable interference conditions.

Towards Robust Communications of Wireless Sensor Networks in Vehicular Environments: A Case Study

“…The focus of the work presented in [6] is to identify coexistence issues between different network access technologies. To do that the authors use a testbed, that allows them to merge signals from different sources and attenuate them accordingly by collecting the signal from the antenna connector of the transceivers in question.…”

Latency and Lifetime Enhancements in Industrial Wireless Sensor Networks: A Q-Learning Approach for Graph Routing

“…The global IWSN market size is anticipated to reach USD 8.67 billion by 2025 [3]. Flexibility, mobility, scalability, low maintenance and reduced infrastructure are advantages of IWSN [4], [5]. An IWSN consists of a set of wireless sensor devices (nodes) connected to a gateway through Access Points (AP).…”

“…Centralized management is used to allow better control of the network operation and also to simplify the hardware and software of the nodes. WirelessHART (WH), ISA SP100.11a and WIA-PA standards are being used in IWSN applications [4]. These standards usually form a mesh network, where nodes may act as routers to increase path availability for communications [6].…”

PI‐based and anti‐windup transmission power control for WirelessHART field devices

“…Under these circumstances, the use of RF power adjustment is also able to improve the network robustness to external interferences. Also, with the ever-increasing number of wireless devices, the coexistence of multiple wireless networks becomes an important matter, as shown by the empiric study in [8], and may also benefit from the RF power modulation. Concerning RF power adjustment, commercial RF transceivers usually present a register to adjust the power level that must be chosen according to the RF link needs.…”