2004
DOI: 10.1109/tuffc.2004.1367486
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wireless measurement of temperature using surface acoustic waves sensors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the last 20 yr, SAW transducers have also been used as wireless sensors in harsh environments such as for temperature measurements as reported in Reindl and Shrena (2004), Friedt et al (2011), Fachberger et al (2006. They have also been used for torque (Beckley et al, 2002;Kalinin and Brown, 2010), strain (Pohl et al, 1999;Friedt et al, 2012), pressure (Reindl et al, 1998;Buff et al, 1997), chemical (Dong et al, 2001;Wang et al, 2009) and moisture level measurements (Kawalec and Pasternak, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the last 20 yr, SAW transducers have also been used as wireless sensors in harsh environments such as for temperature measurements as reported in Reindl and Shrena (2004), Friedt et al (2011), Fachberger et al (2006. They have also been used for torque (Beckley et al, 2002;Kalinin and Brown, 2010), strain (Pohl et al, 1999;Friedt et al, 2012), pressure (Reindl et al, 1998;Buff et al, 1997), chemical (Dong et al, 2001;Wang et al, 2009) and moisture level measurements (Kawalec and Pasternak, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently existing SAW tag products use the so called time position encoding (Plessky et al, 1995;Stierlin & Küng, 2002), which represents the most straightforward way of data encoding in SAW tags. This is the only method currently used in commercial SAW tags (Reindl & Shrena, 2004;Stelzer et al, 2004). In this encoding scheme, the total time delay is divided into slots of certain duration.…”
Section: Time Position Encodingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…we concluded that (1) all of the device parameters had good impedance matching with the propagating SAW, due to very precise device patterning obtained using the EBL, (2) c. Sensitivity evaluation A mechanical compression force was applied to the diaphragm by placing an object at its center, and then the S 11 parameter was measured by the Network analyzer, and the time deviation of the reflected peaks, Δτ, as function of the amount of applied mechanical force was extracted using a parabolic approximation [11]. The phase shifts of the reflected peaks Φ i were obtained from the relation: Φ i = 2πf×Δτ (i=1,2,3).…”
Section: B Wireless Electrical Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%