2015
DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/24/12/125029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wireless monitoring of scour and re-deposited sediment evolution at bridge foundations based on soil electromagnetic properties

Abstract: This version is available at https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/54048/ Strathprints is designed to allow users to access the research output of the University of Strathclyde. Unless otherwise explicitly stated on the manuscript, Copyright © and Moral Rights for the papers on this site are retained by the individual authors and/or other copyright owners. Please check the manuscript for details of any other licences that may have been applied. You may not engage in further distribution of the material for any pro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1) Pulse or radar devices [16][17][18] High Medium (2) Single-use or float-out devices [19] Low Medium (3) Fiber-Bragg grating systems [20,21] Low Low (4) Sounding or driven rod systems [19,22,23] Medium Medium (5) Sound wave devices [24][25][26] High High (6) Electrical conductivity devices [27] High Medium (7) Dielectric probes [28] High Medium Indirect Scour Measurement Devices (8) Tilt sensors [19,24] Low (9) Accelerometers [26,[29][30][31] Low (10) GPS [32,33] Medium (11) Satellite [34,35] Low…”
Section: Measurement During Extreme Event Scour Depth Resolution Detementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…(1) Pulse or radar devices [16][17][18] High Medium (2) Single-use or float-out devices [19] Low Medium (3) Fiber-Bragg grating systems [20,21] Low Low (4) Sounding or driven rod systems [19,22,23] Medium Medium (5) Sound wave devices [24][25][26] High High (6) Electrical conductivity devices [27] High Medium (7) Dielectric probes [28] High Medium Indirect Scour Measurement Devices (8) Tilt sensors [19,24] Low (9) Accelerometers [26,[29][30][31] Low (10) GPS [32,33] Medium (11) Satellite [34,35] Low…”
Section: Measurement During Extreme Event Scour Depth Resolution Detementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dielectric permittivity can therefore be measured if a calibration function is established to convert the resonant frequency read by the sensors into a permittivity value, which differs between the soil in the riverbed and the water [28]. The system is calibrated to detect erosion and deposition of riverbed sediment in different soil types and under temperature that would commonly occur in a real case-study scenario [28]. It also allows for distinction between in situ and redeposited bed material, providing useful information about the load-bearing capacity of bridge foundations.…”
Section: Pilot Scour Monitoring Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One of the main disadvantages of current standards and inspection practices is that, in general, they do not reveal actual riverbed level variations around the foundations of structures due to several issues associated mainly with the actual procedure and frequency of inspections (Michalis et al, 2015). Even though water and flow characteristics around bridge piers have been thoroughly investigated both experimentally and numerically, there is still a lack of a tool that can offer fast and reliable predictions (Valyrakis et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%