Wireless Network Penetration Testing and Security Auditing

Wang, Shaolong; Jian, Wang; Feng, Chao; Pan, Zhipeng

doi:10.1051/itmconf/20160703001

Cited by 12 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Furthermore, re-attack the network that has been applied anticipation. From all the processes that have been carried out, we will get the overall results of each testing process (Wang et al, 2016).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementation of Penetration Testing Tools to Test Wi-Fi Security Levels at the Directorate of Innovation and Business Incubators

Ariyadi,

Pohan

2023

jppipa, pendidikan ipa, fisika, biologi, kimia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Wi-Fi networks have become a critical infrastructure in many organisations, including the Directorate of Innovation and Business Incubator. However, potential vulnerabilities in Wi-Fi networks also increase as technology advances. Therefore, testing is needed to identify and address security that can harm network users. This research aims to implement penetration testing tools in testing the security level of Wi-Fi networks at the Directorate of Innovation and Business Incubator. The penetration testing method is used to test security and assess the level of resistance to attacks on Wi-Fi in the form of simulated attacks. One of the operating systems that provides penetration testing tools that meet the needs of testing is linux times. The tools used in the penetration testing process are airmon-ng, airodump-ng, aireplay-ng, aircrack-ng, macchanger, ettercap and wireshark. The results showed that the Wi-Fi security of the Directorate of Innovation and Business Incubator still needs to be improved where the results of the four types of attacks only one failed, namely MAC Spoofing. In addition, the tests on Denial of Service, Cracking the Encryption, and Man-in-the-Middle attacks were successful. The application of anticipation by increasing Wi-Fi security based on the attacks that have been carried out can prevent these attacks.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Implementation of Penetration Testing Tools to Test Wi-Fi Security Levels at the Directorate of Innovation and Business Incubators

Ariyadi,

Pohan

2023

jppipa, pendidikan ipa, fisika, biologi, kimia

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…According to Wang et al security testing and auditing can minimize the risk and threats of a computer system (Wang, Wang, Feng, & Pan, 2016). Mohamed et al designed and developed a security auditing tool called SAT (Security Administration Tool) and tested it on three common operating systems (Windows 95/98/NT/2000, Linux, and Solaris) to find their weakness and vulnerabilities.…”

Section: Related Workmentioning

confidence: 99%

Security Auditing Tools: A Comparative Study

Islam

2021

IJCSR

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose-This paper concentrates on the comparison of security auditing tools specifying password cracking tools based on different matrices. Passwords are the most popular and dominant means of access control in every authentication process. Every password is vulnerable in the virtual world; all we can do is to delay it for one to break into us. Password cracking used in two opposite intentions; either it can be used for an administrator to protect from unauthorized access and for users to recover forgotten passwords or for an intruder to break into a secure system. Method-A great number of attacks on many systems are related to passwords. Awkwardly, the randomness and length of user-chosen passwords remain the same over time, but in contrast, hardware enhancement continuously gives intruders increasing computational power. So, password cracking has been one of the favorite vulnerable aspects for intruders to gain access to any unauthorized system. Among all available freeware password cracking tools, we choose five renowned tools based on offline and online categories. Results-Cain and Abel is the winner in the offline category, and TCH-Hydra is the winner in the online category in their performance among the tools we have tested. Conclusion-In this paper, the data has been collected by testing each tool several times in different systems as well as all tools in the same system based on different matrices. We have come to a knowledgeable result by comparing data among themselves. The 408 results of the comparison will help in the adoption and usage of these tools and also promote the development and usage of security auditing tools. Recommendations-The results of the comparison will help in the adoption and usage of these tools and also promote the development and usage of security auditing tools.

show abstract

“…To perform data detection, Aicrack-ng and Airodump-ng were used (Cunche, 2014). To further encourage the use of Wi-Fi at the bus stop, an Access Point was created with Airbase-ng (Wang et al, 2016), so that users could connect to a network. All data were stored on the MicroSD card and uploaded to the cloud at the same time so that the data could be analyzed in real time.…”

Section: Detec8on Devicementioning

confidence: 99%

Bus passenger counts using Wi-Fi signals: some cautionary findings

2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Analisa-se a viabilidade de pesquisas sobre usuários de ônibus com base na detecção de endereços MAC WiFi de dispositivos portáteis. A motivação para o estudo decorre da aparente contradição entre casos de sucesso publicados na literatura e resultados de experimentos de campo que realizamos. Requisitos para identificação adequada de passageiros de ônibus são usados como base para avaliar as capacidades do hardware e software de detecção comumente disponíveis. Mais especificamente, os intervalos de tempo decorridos entre as detecções do mesmo dispositivo são tomados como requisito para a determinação do estado do portador do dispositivo e, portanto, a identificação deste como passageiro. Por exemplo, ao realizar pesquisas de embarque e desembarque com equipamentos de detecção instalados a bordo, é necessário que várias detecções ocorram logo após o embarque do passageiro e antes do desembarque, permitindo assim uma estimativa precisa da origem e destino da viagem. Resultados experimentais em ensaios controlados e não controlados indicam que os componentes disponíveis no mercado com software de código aberto podem não fornecer detecções bem-sucedidas. No experimento controlado, encontramos tempos de 40 s para a primeira detecção de 86% dos dispositivos e uma média de 80 s para a segunda detecção de dispositivos. Para o experimento não controlado de viagens em ônibus com carregamento médio, foram encontradas diferenças significativas entre as contagens manuais e os dispositivos detectados. Como resultado dessas observações empíricas, recomenda-se uma avaliação cuidadosa dos esquemas de detecção existentes usados nas pesquisas de número de passageiros.

show abstract

Wireless Network Penetration Testing and Security Auditing

Cited by 12 publications

References 9 publications

Implementation of Penetration Testing Tools to Test Wi-Fi Security Levels at the Directorate of Innovation and Business Incubators

Implementation of Penetration Testing Tools to Test Wi-Fi Security Levels at the Directorate of Innovation and Business Incubators

Security Auditing Tools: A Comparative Study

Bus passenger counts using Wi-Fi signals: some cautionary findings

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About