2010
DOI: 10.1109/icbbe.2010.5515792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wireless Sensor Networks for Water Quality Monitoring: A Case of Zambia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Little progress has been made in Zambia on sensors for monitoring water quality via the internet of things. [10] Contaminant wastewater loads from mines, industry and agriculture activities dumped into the Kafue River System deteriorated the river's quality of water [11]. [9] [12] researched a 'smart water quality monitoring system using cost-effective IoT.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Little progress has been made in Zambia on sensors for monitoring water quality via the internet of things. [10] Contaminant wastewater loads from mines, industry and agriculture activities dumped into the Kafue River System deteriorated the river's quality of water [11]. [9] [12] researched a 'smart water quality monitoring system using cost-effective IoT.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There have been several implementations of WSN-based WQM systems that have been tested or deployed in Australia [Silva et al 2011;Rao et al 2013], China [Jiang et al 2009;Jin et al 2010 [Wiranto et al 2015], Ireland [O'Flyrm et al 2007;Regan et al 2009;O'Connor et al 2012;Garcia et al 2012;Murphy et al 2015], Malawi [Zennaro et al 2009], Malaysia [Rasin and Abdullah 2009], Mexico [Curiel et al 2016], Peru [Ritter et al 2014], Portugal [Postolache et al 2014], Tanzania [Faustine et al 2014], Turkey [Tuna et al 2014], and the United States [Yang et al 2002;Seders et al 2007;Burke and Allenby 2014;Sun et al 2016]. Details of these systems are summarized in Tables VIII and IX. In addition to these implementations, researchers in China [Yang and Pan 2010;Chen et al 2011], India [Verma and Prachi 2012], the kingdom of Saudi Arabia [Aleisa 2013], and Zambia [Chaamwe 2010] describe the limitations of the current WQM practice adopted in their region, and they propose the idea and present the benefit of automating WQM through the adoption of WSN technologies. These different implementations agree on a general WSN-based WQM framework, which includes the use of WSNs, a local monitoring station (or BS), and a remote monitoring station, as described is Section 5.1.…”
Section: Implementations Of Wsn-based Wqm Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These different implementations agree on a general WSN-based WQM framework, which includes the use of WSNs, a local monitoring station (or BS), and a remote monitoring station, as described is Section 5.1. However, most of the existing solutions only focus on the design and implementation of the local monitoring network (i.e., a WSN and local monitoring station), either through laboratory feasibility testing [Chaamwe 2010;Wang et al 2011;Chen et al 2011] or field deployment [Seders et al 2007; O'Flyrm et al 2007;Sun et al 2016], and some of the references actually include the final interconnection with the remote monitoring station [Yang and Pan 2010;Silva et al 2011;Alkandari et al 2011;O'Connor et al 2012;Faustine et al 2014]. Several works provide automated warning signals displayed on computer screens or communicated to decision makers via text or email.…”
Section: Implementations Of Wsn-based Wqm Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Its speed changes with different rate of flow. The hall-effect sensor outputs the corresponding pulse signal [15]. This model (YF-S201) works in the voltage 5v to 18 and can handle water speed up to 2 mpa.…”
Section: B Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%