1999
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-78804-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wissenschaftlicher Briefwechsel mit Bohr, Einstein, Heisenberg u.a. Band IV, Teil II: 1953–1954

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The possibility of a dimensional reduction of a higher-dimensional theory on a sphere, in which a finite number of lower-dimensional fields including the gauge bosons of the isometry group were retained, was in fact conceived by Pauli in 1953 (in the context of an S 2 reduction of six-dimensional Einstein gravity) [7][8][9], but he recognised that the consistency problems mentioned above would be an obstacle to realising his idea. In fact, the S 7 reduction of eleven-dimensional supergravity was the first non-trivial example in which the idea of a "Pauli reduction" [10] actually works.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The possibility of a dimensional reduction of a higher-dimensional theory on a sphere, in which a finite number of lower-dimensional fields including the gauge bosons of the isometry group were retained, was in fact conceived by Pauli in 1953 (in the context of an S 2 reduction of six-dimensional Einstein gravity) [7][8][9], but he recognised that the consistency problems mentioned above would be an obstacle to realising his idea. In fact, the S 7 reduction of eleven-dimensional supergravity was the first non-trivial example in which the idea of a "Pauli reduction" [10] actually works.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the consistency of the S 7 Pauli reduction of eleven-dimensional supergravity has now been fully established, and the uplift ansätze for the metric and 4-form field strength are explicitly known, these expressions are in practice somewhat unwieldy and complicated to use in full generality. In many cases, when for example lifting a solution of the fourdimensional gauged supergravity to D = 11, it may suffice to have explicit expressions for the uplift ansatz for only a subset of the fields in the full four-dimensional supergravity theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…... play with infinite concepts in the present framework is unacceptable and will eventually lead to contradictions, In particular, I don't see how the Coulomb interaction energy can be eliminated unequivocally and free from arbitrariness with the infinitely many occupied states [21].…”
Section: The Problem With the Negative Energy Statesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Notwithstanding this, especially Pauli was very critical with the Dirac theory of negative energy states. "I do not believe in your perception of 'holes', even if the existence of the 'antielectron' is proved", wrote Pauli to Dirac on May 1, 1933 [21]. And, more specifically, in a letter to Heisenberg of July 24, 1933, Pauli pointed out that the ...…”
Section: The Problem With the Negative Energy Statesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Thirty years later, Bell wrote: "In 1952 I saw the impossible done". (24) In fact, still in the beginning of the 1950s, he wrote to Pauli, (25) asking for papers on Bohm's proposal. However, due to some vicissitudes, he only resumed this problem ten years later.…”
Section: The Heated Dispute and Bell's Inequalities As Spin-off Of Bomentioning
confidence: 99%