“…In the context of science, the gaze has been interpreted as a mechanism used to create a perceptual distance so that an entity can be examined objectively; in other words, “A capacity to make external and concrete, and hence situate as perceptually ‘objective’” (Rice , 294). The objectifying gaze is especially relevant to the realm of medicine, which has been associated with visual processes considered essential in the creation and reproduction of (objective) medical knowledge of the body (Draper , 776; Foucault , 107; Howes‐Mischel , 194; Hsu , 7; Maslen , 54; Prentice , 6; Rice , 295; Sieler , 328; Throop , 424; van Drie , 171) . The case study discussed here allows questioning this visual dominancy in medical training, examining the role of nonvisual practices including auditory, tactile, and kinesthetic sensations within the teaching and learning of medical knowledge…”