Carnivore kill frequency is a fundamental part of predatorâprey interactions, which are important shapers of ecosystems. Current field kill frequency data are rare and existing models are insufficiently adapted to carnivore functional groups. We developed a kill frequency model accounting for carnivore mass, prey mass, pack size, partial consumption of prey and carnivore gut capacity. Two main carnivore functional groups, small preyâfeeders versus large preyâfeeders, were established based on the relationship between stomach capacity (C) and pack corrected prey mass (iMprey). Although the majority of small preyâfeeders is below, and of large preyâfeeders above a body mass of 10â20 kg, both occur across the whole body size spectrum, indicating that the dichotomy is rather linked to body sizeârelated ecology than physiology. The model predicts a negative relationship between predator size and kill frequency for large preyâfeeders. However, for small preyâfeeders, this negative relationship was absent. When comparing carnivore prey requirements to estimated stomach capacity, small carnivores may have to eat to their full capacity repeatedly per day, requiring fast digestion and gut clearance. Large carnivores do not necessarily have to eat to full gastric capacity per day, or do not need to eat every day, which in turn reduces kill frequencies or drives other ecological processes such as scavenging, kleptoparasitism, and partial carcass consumption. Where ecological conditions allow, large preyâfeeding appears attractive for carnivores, which can thus reduce activities related to hunting. This is particularly so for large carnivores, who can achieve distinct reductions in hunting activity due to their relatively large gut capacity.