Our aim was to investigate the associations of regional fat distribution with home and office blood pressure (BP) levels and variability. Participants in the Dallas Heart Study, a multiethnic cohort, underwent five BP measurements on three occasions over 5 months (two in-home and one in-office) and quantification of visceral (VAT), abdominal subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), and liver fat by MRI, and lower body subcutaneous fat by dual x-ray absorptiometry. The relation of regional adiposity with short-term (within-visit) and long-term (over all visits) mean BP and average real variability (ARV) was assessed with multivariable linear regression.
2,595 participants mean age 44 years; 54% women, 48% black; and mean BMI 29 kg/m2 were included. Mean SBP/DBP was 127/79mmHg and ARVSBP was 9.8mmHg over 3 visits. In multivariable-adjusted models, higher amount of VAT was associated with higher short-term (both home and office) and long-term mean SBP (β[SE]: 1.9[0.5], 2.7[0.5], and 2.1[0.5], respectively, all P<0.001), and with lower long-term ARVSBP (β[SE]: -0.5[0.2], P<0.05). In contrast, lower body fat was associated with lower short-term home and long-term mean BP (β[SE]: -0.30[0.13] and -0.24[0.1], respectively, both P<0.05). Neither SAT or liver fat were associated with BP levels or variability.
In conclusion, excess visceral fat was associated with persistently higher short- and long-term mean BP level and with lower long-term BP variability whereas lower body fat was associated with lower short- and long-term mean BP. Persistently elevated BP, coupled with lower variability, may partially explain increased risk for cardiac hypertrophy and failure related to visceral adiposity.