2013
DOI: 10.1057/9781137313737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Witnessing the Revolutionary and Napoleonic Wars in German Central Europe

Abstract: heruntergeladen über Website Dieser Beitrag kann vom Nutzer zu eigenen nicht-kommerziellen Zwecken heruntergeladen und/oder ausgedruckt werden. Darüber hinausgehende Nutzungen sind ohne weitere Genehmigung der Rechteinhaber nur im Rahmen der gesetzlichen Schrankenbestimmungen ( § § 44a-63a UrhG) zulässig.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A first tradition originates in the work of Reinhardt Koselleck and includes advocates and critics of the idea that extreme experiences of rupture caused by dramatic events during the revolutionary and Napoleonic eras may be held responsible for new, 'modern' forms of historical awareness and concepts of time (Baggerman, 2011;Becker, 1999;Berman, 1982;Deseure & Pollmann, 2013;Fritzsche, 2004;Hartog, 2003;Koselleck, 1979;Koselleck & Reichardt, 1988;Terdiman, 1993). A second tradition, which builds on the older German Alltagsgeschichte, focuses more in particular on the (military and economic) experience of the revolutionary and Napoleonic wars to understand what impact they had on people's lives (Aaslestad & Joor, 2015;Forrest, Hagemann, & Rendall, 2009;James, 2013;Planert, 2007;Planert, 2009). While they ultimately study experience for different reasons, these two traditions have in common that they treat experiences as subjective perceptions and predominantly make use of autobiographical writing to capture these perceptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A first tradition originates in the work of Reinhardt Koselleck and includes advocates and critics of the idea that extreme experiences of rupture caused by dramatic events during the revolutionary and Napoleonic eras may be held responsible for new, 'modern' forms of historical awareness and concepts of time (Baggerman, 2011;Becker, 1999;Berman, 1982;Deseure & Pollmann, 2013;Fritzsche, 2004;Hartog, 2003;Koselleck, 1979;Koselleck & Reichardt, 1988;Terdiman, 1993). A second tradition, which builds on the older German Alltagsgeschichte, focuses more in particular on the (military and economic) experience of the revolutionary and Napoleonic wars to understand what impact they had on people's lives (Aaslestad & Joor, 2015;Forrest, Hagemann, & Rendall, 2009;James, 2013;Planert, 2007;Planert, 2009). While they ultimately study experience for different reasons, these two traditions have in common that they treat experiences as subjective perceptions and predominantly make use of autobiographical writing to capture these perceptions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%