Wolf Canis lupus numbers, diet and damage to livestock in relation to hunting and ungulate abundance in northeastern Belarus during 1990–2000

Abstract

Wolf Canis lupus relationships with wild ungulates, domestic animals and humans were studied in an area of ca 800 km2 at the head of the Lovat River in north eastern Belarus during 1990Belarus during -2000. The region was dominated by natural habi tats (78%) consisting mainly of forests and bogs, but also lakes and rivers. The abundance of wild ungulates, such as moose Alces alces, wild boar Sus scrof a , and roe deer Capreolus capreolus, as censused by snow tracking and assessed by game wardens, declined 5 to 6-fold between 1990 and 1996, most probably due to uncontrolled exploitation and poaching. During 1997-2000, the numbers of ungulates began to recover. Wolves responded to the shortage of wild ungulates by a strong shift in feeding habits. When wild ungulates were numerous, wolf diet as studied by scat analysis was composed of wild ungu lates (80-88% of consumed biomass), with small additions of medium-and small-s i z e d wild animals (7-13%), mainly beaver Castor fib er and hare Lepus sp., and domestic animals (4-6%), mainly cattle. In the years when the recorded numbers of wild ungulates were at their lowest, wolves preyed on domestic ani mals (38% of biomass consumed), wild ungulates (32%), and medium-and small-s i z e d wild prey (29%). Wolf damage to domestic animals (28 head of cattle and 247 dogs killed) and wolf-human interaction (100 observations of wolves in and near villages, including one attack by a rabid wolf on 11 people) were record ed in 14 villages. The rate of wolf predation on domestic animals and their appear ances in villages increased exponentially with the declining biomass of wild ungulates and ceased again when wild ungulates began to recover; a one-year time lag in wolf response to changes in ungulate abundance was observed. The numbers of wolves as estimated by snow tracking and assessed by game war dens played a weaker role in shaping wolf-livestock and wolf-human interac tion. The wolf population was strongly affected by hunting during the study. Wolves responded numerically with a 1 to 2-year time lag to the varying intensity of harvest by humans. Our study showed the role of the human fac tor in shaping wolf numbers and wolf-livestock interaction in eastern Europe. The three major components of this relationship were: 1) the manifold decline in wild ungulate abundance, which was most probably caused by uncontrolled exploitation by humans in the years of political transformation and econom ic regress, made wolves shift to predation on domestic animals; inevitably, wolves were frequently seen in the rural areas; 2) people interpreted the growing rates of wolf damage and appearances near the settlements as an effect of great ly increasing numbers of wolves, and demanded that authorities and hunters fight the 'wolf plague'; 3) hunting impact on wolves increased and led to a marked reduction in wolf numbers and a decline in wolf-human conflicts. This scenar io was most probably repeated in many areas of eastern Europe during 1990-2 , which was a decade of political and economical...

Prey selection and dietary response by wolves in a high-density multi-species ungulate community

“…Apart from the Italian Apennines (Mattioli et al 1995;Ciucci et al 1996;Meriggi et al 1996Mattioli et al 2004), a similar result was found only in a few other locations of Eastern Europe like Estonia (Kübarsepp and Valdmann 2003), Russia (Rusakov andTimofeeva 1984 in Okarma 1995) and Belarus (Sidorovich et al 2003).…”

Genome-wide signatures of population bottlenecks and diversifying selection in European wolves

“…This was likely connected with the disruption of pack structure due to strong hunting pressure (for example, see Jędrzejewski et al, 2005). In one of the regions with elevated ROH levels, Northern Belarus, strong hunting pressure has been well documented (Sidorovich et al, 2003).…”

“…However, the Eastern European population has experienced strong hunting pressure for many generations, and the hunting continues in most of its range to this day. As a result of hunting pressures on both the wolves and their prey, the Eastern European wolves have suffered multiple local demographic fluctuations (for example, Spiridinov and Spassov, 1985;Jędrzejewska et al, 1996;Ozolins and Andersone, 2001;Sidorovich et al, 2003;Gomercic et al, 2010).…”

Sympatric prey responses to lethal top-predator control: predator manipulation experiments

“…fear, competition) effects on sympatric mesopredator and herbivore species is well known [7][8][9], top-predators are often lethally controlled to protect livestock, managed game and some threatened fauna from top-predator predation (e.g. [19][20][21][22]). Lethal control of top-predators is typically achieved through trapping, shooting and/or poisoning in different parts of the world.…”