1976
DOI: 10.1002/j.2164-6163.1976.tb00206.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Women and Educational Administration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
16
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fourthly, it is also clear that the objects which remain on the local relation, even out to the highest redshifts, are star‐forming discs, with the passive galaxies, including the passive disc components, confined to the more compact population. This result mirrors that recently reported by McLure et al () who found, for spectroscopically confirmed galaxies of comparably high mass at z ≃ 1.4, that all objects with low sSFR (i.e. sSFR < 10 −10 Gyr −1 ) lie below the present‐day size–mass relation, irrespective of morphological classification.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Fourthly, it is also clear that the objects which remain on the local relation, even out to the highest redshifts, are star‐forming discs, with the passive galaxies, including the passive disc components, confined to the more compact population. This result mirrors that recently reported by McLure et al () who found, for spectroscopically confirmed galaxies of comparably high mass at z ≃ 1.4, that all objects with low sSFR (i.e. sSFR < 10 −10 Gyr −1 ) lie below the present‐day size–mass relation, irrespective of morphological classification.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Moreover, several local studies have now clarified the relative dearth of comparably compact systems surviving to the present day (Trujillo et al ; Taylor et al ), strengthening the argument that the compact high‐redshift systems must undergo a period of significant size evolution with limited mass growth in order to reach the local galaxy size–mass relation by z = 0 (e.g. McLure et al ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, we note that the sSFR ≳ 10–100 Gyr −1 obtained here for the LAEs is significantly larger than the typical value of ∼2–3 Gyr −1 found for LBGs by other authors at z ∼ 2 and at redshifts up to z > 6 (see e.g. Daddi et al 2007; Stark et al 2009; González et al 2010; McLure et al 2011). However, some LBGs at z ∼ 2–3 (Erb et al 2006b,c; Yoshikawa et al 2010; Dessauges‐Zavadsky et al 2011), some LAEs at z ∼ 3–4 (Ono et al 2010) and some LBGs at z ≳ 4 (Schaerer & de Barros 2010; de Barros et al, in preparation) also show comparably high sSFR (and a large scatter).…”
Section: Sed Fittingcontrasting
confidence: 69%