Darjeeling Reconsidered 2018
DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780199483556.003.0012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Women, Fair Trade Tea, and Everyday Entrepreneurialism in Rural Darjeeling

Abstract: Based on more than a decade of ethnographic research in Darjeeling’s non-plantation tea producing areas, this chapter highlights the gendered effects of Fair Trade certification of organic non-plantation tea on rural tea cooperatives. Through a focus on rural women’s everyday entrepreneurialism and their run-ins with the transnational Fair Trade bureaucracy, the chapter underscores how Fair Trade interventions can inadvertently strengthen patriarchal/gendered power relations in Fair Trade certified tea coopera… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The term literally means “spoon” and is used colloquially to identify a person who employs sycophancy ( chamchagiri ) to establish a personal relationship with superordinates. Sen (2009, p. 131) defines a chamcha as “someone who is sly and always on the lookout to score points over his co-workers […] by misreporting about work etc”. The chamchas of a workplace have curried the favour or trust of a supervisor, either through ingratiation or a pre-existing relationship and, by extension, enjoy their patronage and some authority through tacit delegation.…”
Section: Power Distance In Indiamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The term literally means “spoon” and is used colloquially to identify a person who employs sycophancy ( chamchagiri ) to establish a personal relationship with superordinates. Sen (2009, p. 131) defines a chamcha as “someone who is sly and always on the lookout to score points over his co-workers […] by misreporting about work etc”. The chamchas of a workplace have curried the favour or trust of a supervisor, either through ingratiation or a pre-existing relationship and, by extension, enjoy their patronage and some authority through tacit delegation.…”
Section: Power Distance In Indiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chamchagiri is a common dynamic of workplace relationships in India (Srivastava and Kulkarni, 2009; Sen, 2009; Gupta and Sharma, 2003). However, issues surrounding favouritism and sycophancy were particularly acute at this joint-venture.…”
Section: Findings and Data Sharingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars have engaged at length with collectives in development contexts. Within these engagements, microcredit-based collectives have been explored in depth, looking at the ways in which they shape gendered labour within communities and the possibilities these collectives create (or hamper) for social and economic mobility (Kalpana, 2017; Karim, 2011; Rankin, 2002; Sen, 2018). Microcredit programmes have required women to come together to take loans in groups or as individuals to fulfil strategies of Gender and Development (GAD) outlined by states or international development agencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women restructure their lives and reimagine their selfhoods around state-led development interventions. In making this argument, I speak to scholarship that pays attention to various kinds of women’s collectives and their role in creating possibilities for gendered social change (Jakimow, 2014; Poma & Gravante, 2017; Rankin, 2002; Sanyal, 2014; Sen, 2018; Sharma, 2008). In a counterinsurgency context, the possibilities of change are greater because the relationship between poor women and the state is being reworked by both sides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Paradoxically, in the securitized context of counterinsurgency, women began to reimagine selfhoods through state-directed collectives. This argument builds on feminist scholarship that looks at women’s collectives as offering possibilities for social change, through women’s negotiations with dominant neoliberal ideas and forces of capitalist accumulation (Roy, 2019; Sen, 2018; Sharma, 2008). I show that women might not concur with the agendas of the security state, even find themselves in precarious economic positions, and yet they find spaces to rework their lives and livelihoods through state-directed collectives and development programmes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%