2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2011.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Women's knowledge of options for birth after Caesarean Section

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chen and Hancock showed that many women who underwent CS lacked sufficient information about their delivery options in subsequent pregnancies. The authors emphasized that not being aware of the recent scientific evidence of drawbacks and benefits of either trial of labor or repeat cesarean prevented these women from rethinking their preference .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chen and Hancock showed that many women who underwent CS lacked sufficient information about their delivery options in subsequent pregnancies. The authors emphasized that not being aware of the recent scientific evidence of drawbacks and benefits of either trial of labor or repeat cesarean prevented these women from rethinking their preference .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…54 These knowledge deficits about birth options after previous cesarean may constrain women's choices to seek access to VBAC. 55 Knowledge of risks and benefits of birth options might also help to address women's fear and concern about their bodies being inadequate for birth.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women could also, at counseling before delivery, have been guaranteed an unplanned CD in second labor if there were any signs of prolonged delivery. Preferences for elective second CD or TOLAC are multifactorial and contextual and can vary depending on background or socio‐economic status . Such selection effects were, however, partly eliminated by controlling for confounders in the multivariable analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%