2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2022.102839
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Women’s well-being during a pandemic and its containment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the vulnerability profile is biased in regard to these aspects since they are the ones that explain citizens’ quality of life. This is consistent with studies such as that by King et al [ 37 ] but in other aspects aligns with that by Bau et al [ 38 ], who concluded that gender differences which pre-date the pandemic are being exacerbated. On the other hand, in terms of age, the results reveal that young people are the most affected in terms of the work and educational environment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this case, the vulnerability profile is biased in regard to these aspects since they are the ones that explain citizens’ quality of life. This is consistent with studies such as that by King et al [ 37 ] but in other aspects aligns with that by Bau et al [ 38 ], who concluded that gender differences which pre-date the pandemic are being exacerbated. On the other hand, in terms of age, the results reveal that young people are the most affected in terms of the work and educational environment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Those who worked were more affected, given the difficulties in achieving a work–life balance during lockdown [ 37 ], with women more often having to take care of other family members than men. The gender differences that already existed in pre-pandemic times have thus been accentuated [ 38 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study informs these conversations and unpacks how women engage with technology like m‐Health interventions for maternity health management with constraints in the developing world. Our findings suggest that while the pandemic has had an adverse effect, especially on women worldwide, including in India (Rathi & Chatterjee 2022 ; Bau et al 2021 ; Ribarovska et al, 2021 ; Xue & McMunn, 2021 ; Yaish et al, 2021 ; Zamarro & Prados, 2021 ; Deshpande, 2020 ; Myers et al, 2020 and Ravindran & Shah, 2020 , among many others), in some rare contexts like ours, it may have had a positive welfare effect of an increase in technology engagement. While the lack of data does not allow us to investigate whether it translates into better maternal health outcomes, we hope that, on the margin, it may have given the large body of evidence now on the welfare‐enhancing aspect of mobile phones (Cawley & Ruhm, 2011 ; Dupas, 2011a ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The literature was largely focused on the immediate confinement measures and the consequences on care/domestic work and violence [ 95 ], while there was no in-depth and central analysis of other inequity markers related to medium and long-term impacts that will surely affect recovery, such as food and nutritional insecurity, loss of livelihood, indebtedness, low resilience, and rising poverty [ 95 ]. Food and nutritional insecurity issues were considered by Chitando [ 31 ], Oladeinde [ 33 ], Arora et al [ 40 ], Singh et al [ 44 ], Bau et al [ 55 ], and Pinchoff et al [ 69 ] carried out in African countries and India. A part of the documents analysed the gender impacts globally and immediate employment consequences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%