2017
DOI: 10.1093/oep/gpx028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Women voters and trade protectionism in the interwar years

Abstract: Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The only related research on the topic asks how women’s suffrage reshaped trade policy and yields competing results. Hall, Kao, and Nelson (1998) argue that women gaining the franchise in the United States led to a reduction in trade barriers, whereas De Bromhead (2018) examines 30 countries during the interwar period and concludes that women’s suffrage led to an increase in trade barriers. Neither examines the effects of women’s representation in parties or government.…”
Section: The Gender Gap In Trade Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The only related research on the topic asks how women’s suffrage reshaped trade policy and yields competing results. Hall, Kao, and Nelson (1998) argue that women gaining the franchise in the United States led to a reduction in trade barriers, whereas De Bromhead (2018) examines 30 countries during the interwar period and concludes that women’s suffrage led to an increase in trade barriers. Neither examines the effects of women’s representation in parties or government.…”
Section: The Gender Gap In Trade Preferencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por fim, destacam-se duas outras abordagens que se afastam da explicação assentada no autointeresse econômico. A primeira enfatiza a diferença entre gêneros (gender gap) na avaliação da globalização e do livre comércio internacional, mostrando que, em geral, as mulheres são mais protecionistas (Beaulieu e Napier, 2008;Burgoon e Hiscox, 2008;Drope e Chowdhury, 2014;Mansfield, Mutz e Silver, 2015;Kagitani e Harimaya, 2017;Bromhead, 2018). Burgoon e Hiscox (2008) e Hiscox (2006) atribuem preferências distintas entre gêneros em razão de o número de homens em cursos de economia ser maior do que o de mulheres.…”
Section: Opinião Pública Globalização E Livre Comérciounclassified
“…A segunda abordagem considera que a avaliação feita pelos indivíduos sobre os parceiros comerciais influi nas suas atitudes em relação ao livre comércio. Simpatia pelo país parceiro seria mais importante do que o cálculo autointeressado dos benefícios ou FLÁVIO PINHEIRO; IVAN FILIPE FERNANDES; MARIA HERMINIA TAVARES DE ALMEIDA desvantagens de acordos de livre comércio (Chiang, Liu e Wen, 2013;DiGiuseppe e Kleinberg, 2018;Hicks, Milner e Tingley, 2014;Naoi e Urata, 2013;Spilker, Bernauer e Umaña, 2016, 2018.…”
Section: Opinião Pública Globalização E Livre Comérciounclassified