2009
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcp270
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wood identification of Dalbergia nigra (CITES Appendix I) using quantitative wood anatomy, principal components analysis and naive Bayes classification

Abstract: Wood anatomy alone cannot distinguish D. nigra from all other commercially important Dalbergia species likely to be encountered by customs officials, but can be used to reduce the number of specimens that would need further study.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
50
0
7

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
50
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Although only around 10-15 species are of economic importance [28], separation of some of them is nowadays a challenge [29]. Several species of the genus have been traded (and still they are) under the name "rosewood" [1], the supposed attribution for this veneer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although only around 10-15 species are of economic importance [28], separation of some of them is nowadays a challenge [29]. Several species of the genus have been traded (and still they are) under the name "rosewood" [1], the supposed attribution for this veneer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examining the wood anatomy is generally the first and most crucial step in the identification process (Koch, 2017). Gasson et al (2010) show that quantitative wood anatomy can help to differentiate selected Dalbergia species. Furthermore, IAWA features like (206) water extract basically colourless to brown or shades of brown, (210) ethanol extract fluorescent, (211) ethanol extract basically colourless to brown or shades of brown, (214) ethanol extract not as above, and (215) froth test positive, seem to be useful to differentiate species within the same genus (Richter et al, 1996, Miller & Wiemann, 2006.…”
Section: Povzetek Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kot dopolnitev standardnih anatomskih metod se je kot obetavna izkazala uporaba kvantitativne anatomije in Bayesove klasifikacije (Gasson et al, 2010), ki temelji na dimenzijah elementov v lesu in njihovi pogostosti ter verjetnostni oceni, da določeni kvantitativni podatki veljajo samo za posamezne vrste. Avtorji so na primer pokazali, da je vrsti D. cearensis and D. miscolobium mogoče razlikovati od D. nigra na osnovi podatkov o pogostosti trahej in trakov.…”
Section: Razlikovanje Vrst Znotraj Rodu Dalbergia Differentaition Of unclassified
See 2 more Smart Citations