1993
DOI: 10.1093/ijl/6.4.253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Word Families

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
421
0
16

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 508 publications
(441 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
421
0
16
Order By: Relevance
“…The lists were based on the frequency and range of occurrence of words in the BNC. The word families in the lists were categorized as Level 6 according to Bauer and Nation's (1993) If the most frequent 3,000 word families plus proper nouns and marginal words is sufficient for comprehension of television programs (Webb & Rodgers, 2009a), examining the low frequency vocabulary found in the 4,000-14,000 word lists which may be unknown to L2 learners may indicate the potential for incidental vocabulary learning. The number of times word families from these word lists were encountered may indicate whether unknown vocabulary is more likely to reoccur in related television programs than unrelated programs.…”
Section: Software and Word Listsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lists were based on the frequency and range of occurrence of words in the BNC. The word families in the lists were categorized as Level 6 according to Bauer and Nation's (1993) If the most frequent 3,000 word families plus proper nouns and marginal words is sufficient for comprehension of television programs (Webb & Rodgers, 2009a), examining the low frequency vocabulary found in the 4,000-14,000 word lists which may be unknown to L2 learners may indicate the potential for incidental vocabulary learning. The number of times word families from these word lists were encountered may indicate whether unknown vocabulary is more likely to reoccur in related television programs than unrelated programs.…”
Section: Software and Word Listsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fact that affixes differ in terms of frequency, regularity, predictability and productivity, i.e. that affix accessibility and learnability is higher for some affixes than others, prompted Bauer and Nation (1993) to develop a seven-level affix order that can facilitate reading and function as a basis for guided teaching and learning. This list served as a reference point in a few articles focusing on L2 affix acquisition, some of which we will elaborate on in the next couple of paragraphs.…”
Section: Introduction: the Nexus Between Vocabulary And Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ПошPо ћемо меPо:оло;ију наше; исPраживања Pе-мељиPи на консPрукцији сличних инсPруменаPа, :еPаљније ћемо оAисаPи Aроце:уре које су коришћене у овој сPу:ији. По-знавање афикса AосмаPрано је у скла:у са нивоима које су, :о:у-ше са циљем унаAређивања разумевања PексPа, осмислили Бау-ер и Нејшн (Bauer & Nation, 1993), Pј. узимајући у оLзир оAа:ајућу фреквенPносP и Aро:укPивносP афикса, њихову семанPичку PрансAаренPносP, али и чињеницу :а Aоје:ини афикси, ка:а се :о:ају на PворLену основу, :ово:е :о Aромене врсPе речи (ен;л. class-changing affixes).…”
Section: лексика деривациона морфологија и усвајање енглеског језикаunclassified