2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Word length effects in long-term memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
48
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
2
48
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These similar patterns of rehearsal in the two tasks complexity to the word length effect (Neath & Nairne, 1995). However, regardless of the preferred alternative, our data must surely be consistent with factors other than solely differential rehearsal's contributing to the word length effect (e.g., Brown & Hulme, 1995;Hulme et al, 2006;Hulme et al, 2004;Lewandowsky & Farrell, 2000;Lewandowsky & Oberauer, 2008;Nairne, 2002;Tehan & Tolan, 2007).…”
Section: Observed Similarities Between Free Recall and Isrsupporting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These similar patterns of rehearsal in the two tasks complexity to the word length effect (Neath & Nairne, 1995). However, regardless of the preferred alternative, our data must surely be consistent with factors other than solely differential rehearsal's contributing to the word length effect (e.g., Brown & Hulme, 1995;Hulme et al, 2006;Hulme et al, 2004;Lewandowsky & Farrell, 2000;Lewandowsky & Oberauer, 2008;Nairne, 2002;Tehan & Tolan, 2007).…”
Section: Observed Similarities Between Free Recall and Isrsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…These data suggest that the differences in the shapes of the serial position curves were due more to the retrieval characteristics of the different tasks than to differences in strategic encoding. it provides evidence in support of the concept of trace decay (Baddeley, 2007;Cowan, 2005;Mueller, Seymour, Kieras, & Meyer, 2003;Schweikert & Boruff, 1986), although many alternative explanations have since been proposed (e.g., Brown & Hulme, 1995;Hulme et al, 2006;Hulme, Suprenant, Bireta, Stuart, & Neath, 2004;Lewandowsky & Farrell, 2000;Lewandowsky & Oberauer, 2008;Nairne, 2002;Neath & Nairne, 1995;Tehan & Tolan, 2007). The working memory model (Baddeley, 1986) assumes that the word length effect is a key empirical finding supporting the existence of the phonological loop mechanism of working memory that is used for both rehearsal and recall in ISR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Frequently, the second dimension captures variation among the items. Hendry and Tehan (2005; see also Tehan & Tolan, 2007) have suggested an item/order trade-off account of the word length effect that may well apply to the other benchmark data. The basic thrust of this argument is that items that can be encoded easily at the item level (e.g., short words, dissimilar-sounding items, words without background speech or no concurrent articulation) will benefit with regard to encoding of order.…”
Section: Explaining Backward Recallmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…some studies 8,23 found a significant reduction in length presented by apraxics and an absence of word length effect, akin to results found in healthy adults under articulatory suppression conditions. And observed that the alteration in material retrieval found in apraxics involves the articulatory planning stage of speech production.…”
Section: Working Memory Testsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Baddeley et al 1,5 used monosyllabic words and compared their span with fivesyllable words. some authors 23 also found the word length effect in long-term memory tests and considered monosyllabic words as short words. Perhaps the use of words with a greater difference in length could have evidenced the length effect in controls.…”
Section: Working Memory Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%