2011
DOI: 10.1503/cmaj.100713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Work ability in midlife as a predictor of mortality and disability in later life: a 28-year prospective follow-up study

Abstract: P rospective studies with a follow-up time stretching from midlife to old age have shown that lower socioeconomic status, as indicated by lower education level or occupational grade, predicts a decline in health and functioning in the working population.1-4 This association is similar, if not more pronounced, in old age. 5-7Higher levels of work-related mental and physical strain increase the risk of early retirement and predict a decline in health and an increase in mortality among the working population. 3,[… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
88
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(97 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(24 reference statements)
7
88
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that mortality was relatively high in our sample due to the fact that the sample consisted of middle-aged employees. It has been shown within this sample that the perceived work ability (WAS) was predictive of mortality (29). It can be assumed that the deceased persons had more severe morbidities compared to the survivors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It should be noted that mortality was relatively high in our sample due to the fact that the sample consisted of middle-aged employees. It has been shown within this sample that the perceived work ability (WAS) was predictive of mortality (29). It can be assumed that the deceased persons had more severe morbidities compared to the survivors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…The range of the summative index is 7-49. Originally (12), the cut-off points for the levels of work ability were based on the 15 th percentile, median, and 85 th percentile of the distribution of the index in the total population at baseline: (i) poor , (ii) moderate (28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35)(36), (iii) good (37-43), and (iv) excellent (44-49). For the analyses here, we combined good and excellent work ability into one category.…”
Section: Work Ability Index (Wai)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structural equation modeling is very useful when one dependent variable becomes independent in subsequent analyzes 56 : for example, the WA variable can be an outcome of rehabilitation and a predictor of well-being, early retirement or morbidity and mortality in advanced age 24,57 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four-year follow-up data were collected in 1985 (n=5556) (Ilmarinen et al 1991;Tuomi et al 1997;von Bonsdorff et al 2011). The study population includes 5429 persons (3108 women and 2321 men) who had information available on workrelated stress symptoms in 1981 and 1985 and a number of mobility limitations during the follow-up (74 % of target population).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%