BackgroundPrevious studies indicate that psychological, social, and organizational factors at work contribute to health, motivation, absence from work, and functional ability.The objective of the study was to assess the current state of knowledge of the contribution of psychological, social, and organizational factors to disability retirement by a systematic review and meta-analyses.Methods
Data sources: A systematic literature search for studies of retirement due to disability in Medline, Embase, and PsychINFO was performed. Reference lists of relevant articles were hand-searched for additional studies. Data extraction: Internal validity was assessed independently by two referees with a detailed checklist for sources of bias. Conclusions were drawn based on studies with acceptable quality. Data synthesis: We calculated combined effect estimates by means of averaged associations (Risk ratios) across samples, weighting observed associations by the study’s sample size. Thirty-nine studies of accepted quality were found, 37 of which from the Nordic countries.ResultsThere was moderate evidence for the role of low control (supported by weighted average RR = 1.40; 95% CI = 1.21-1.61) and moderate evidence for the combination of high demands and low control (although weighted average was RR = 1.45; 95% CI = 0.96-2.19) as predictors of disability retirement. There were no major systematic differences in findings between the highest rated and the lowest rated studies that passed the criterion for adequate quality. There was limited evidence for downsizing, organizational change, lack of employee development and supplementary training, repetitive work tasks, effort-reward imbalance to increase risk of disability pension. Very limited evidence was found for job demands, evening or night work, and low social support from ones superior.ConclusionsPsychological and organizational factors at work contribute to disability retirement with the most robust evidence for the role of work control. We recommend the measurement of specific exposure factors in future studies.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4059-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
P rospective studies with a follow-up time stretching from midlife to old age have shown that lower socioeconomic status, as indicated by lower education level or occupational grade, predicts a decline in health and functioning in the working population.1-4 This association is similar, if not more pronounced, in old age.
5-7Higher levels of work-related mental and physical strain increase the risk of early retirement and predict a decline in health and an increase in mortality among the working population. 3,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] However, the association between the demands of the work in conjunction with inadequate mental or physical resources (i.e., work ability) 16 and health and functioning in old age has not been studied.17 Using a population-based 28-year follow-up study involving middle-aged municipal employees, we investigated whether work ability in midlife predicts the risk of death and disability during old age among white-collar and blue-collar employees.
Methods
Participants and designThe Finnish Institute of Occupational Health's Finnish Longitudinal Study on Municipal Employees (FLAME) targeted 7344 individuals aged 44-58 years at baseline in 1981.18 The participants had been chosen at random from members of all municipal professions in Finland. The baseline cohort consisted of 6257 employees (44.7% men), for a response rate of 85.2%. The first questionnaire, which explored work, health and lifestyle factors, was sent out in 1981, and follow-up data were collected in 1985, 1992, 1997 and 2009. Data on work ability were missing for 199 women and 87 men. The analyses in this study are based on the responses of 5971 Work ability in midlife as a predictor of mortality and disability in later life: a 28-year prospective follow-up study Mikaela B. von Research CMAJ Background: Poor work ability correlates with increased morbidity and early retirement from the workforce, but the association in old age is not known. We investigated work ability in midlife among white-collar and blue-collar employees as a predictor of mortality and disability 28 years later.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.