Work and labour in the Bangladesh brackish-water shrimp export sector*

Abstract

This paper 1 argues that discussions about the applicability of labour and environmental policies, standards and codes of conduct in Bangladesh must be based upon an understanding of the diverse local environmental, economic and social conditions under which people work and sustain their livelihoods. In the case of the shrimp export sector, such understanding is limited as no comprehensive study of the sector as whole and the role of labour and environmental issues within it has been carried out. The paper goes some way to filling this gap in our knowledge by drawing on the authors' continuing research on the shrimp export industry in Southeast Bangladesh and other sources to describe the different forms of work and labour in the industry's various subsectors, paying particular attention to processing plants, shrimp farms, wild fry collection and hatcheries. It shows the great diversity in work and environmental conditions in the sector, illustrates the relationship between work, labour and environment in the fry collecting sub-sector and makes recommendations for further research. 1 The paper arises out of an ongoing three year Australia Research Council-funded project (project no: A00105797) entitled: Globalising production and local impacts: business strategies, labour organisation and local environments in the Bangladesh brackish-water shrimp export sector. The authors wish to thank the ARC, the Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS) and Bangladesh Centre for Advanced Studies (BCAS) for their financial and logistical support. An earlier version of this paper was presented at a workshop entitled: Globalisation, trade liberalisation and economic growth in Asia: should labour and environmental standards be part of the equation? The case of Bangladesh,

Climate change, environmental stress and loss of livelihoods can push people towards illegal activities: a case study from coastal Bangladesh

“…Due to salinity intrusion, shrimp cultivation has become popular at the coastal belt of Bangladesh and supplies for most of these shrimp farms come from wild shrimp sources. Shrimp farming has expanded significantly in the region since the 1980s, due to the high export value of shrimp and as a result, so has wild shrimp collection (Pokrant & Reeves, 2003). However, in 2000, the Bangladesh government declared a ban on catching wild shrimp fries from the rivers due to it adverse effects on other fish species and presently it is illegal to do so (Islam et al, 2015).…”

“…It is therefore important to develop a people-centered perspective on livelihood resilience and understanding on anthropogenic factors of that specific area which not only emphasize on the ability to absorb the shock but also to improve the livelihood condition despite disturbance (Ayeb-Karlsson et al, 2016;Obiri & Damnyag, 2011). Policies should also consider the diversity of local environmental, social and economic factors since people work within these factors (Pokrant & Reeves, 2003). These will help local communities to alleviate their vulnerability to different environmental stressors and to ensure resilient livelihoods.…”

Perception of Climate Change in Shrimp-Farming Communities in Bangladesh: A Critical Assessment

“…We selected these districts because of some compelling reasons. First, these three districts comprise about 80% of total shrimp farms in Bangladesh [47,48]. Second, these areas are most vulnerable to climate change events like tropical cyclones, sea-level rise, salinity intrusion, and storm surges [13,23,49,50,51].…”

From pond to plate: Towards a twin-driven commodity chain in Bangladesh shrimp aquaculture

“…Demand for shrimp products stemmed from Europe, the United States, Japan and the Middle East; while the European Union continues to be the largest importer of Bangladeshi shrimp (Pokrant and Reeves, 2003;Khatun, 2004;Gammage et al, 2006). Shrimp, being the second largest industry in Bangladesh next to garments, brings a foreign exchange of about US$360 million annually, which accounts for 4.9% of exports in 2004 (Gammage et al, 2006, p. 1).…”