2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.kontakt.2017.10.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Work satisfaction and mental pressure of social workers and workers in social services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the obtained results confirm the findings by other scientists. Similarities pertain to the dependence of employee satisfaction on the results of their work (GSSWA, 2017;Marmo & Berkman, 2020;Mrhálek & Kajanová, 2018;Zegarac, 2016). At the same time, this study outlines a new cross-section of social workers' job satisfaction research, namely the fear of job loss.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In general, the obtained results confirm the findings by other scientists. Similarities pertain to the dependence of employee satisfaction on the results of their work (GSSWA, 2017;Marmo & Berkman, 2020;Mrhálek & Kajanová, 2018;Zegarac, 2016). At the same time, this study outlines a new cross-section of social workers' job satisfaction research, namely the fear of job loss.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In the research of Rahman et al (2017), the role of the work environment was high (6). In some studies evaluation was criticized by staff and even managers for various reasons (13)(14)(15). From the results of the research hypotheses in the study of the status of job satisfaction and its components among employees of sports federations, it was found that the job satisfaction status was lower than the mean in staff and Wilcoxon test was not meaningful, thus confirming the undesirable level of satisfaction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reasons for this dissatisfaction are a variety of factors, which includes the complexity of the evaluation process and the existence of deficiencies in the comprehensive evaluation system (14). According to Mrhalek & Kajanova (2017), dissatisfaction was shown for career development and evaluation of their work (15). Huselid (1995) claims that the performance evaluation system is the most important step that can improve knowledge, skills and capabilities of the current and future staff of an organization, increase staff's incentive, reduce workload and increase labor longevity (16).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Mrhálek & Kajanová (2017), job satisfaction can be interpreted as behavior towards work, both positive and negative emotional states that come from work life. Job satisfaction can arise from how employees evaluate employees' work every day that can bring up certain feelings.…”
Section: Job Satisfactionmentioning
confidence: 99%