2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3105671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Work Schedule and Work Schedule Control Fit: Work-Family Conflict, Work-Family Synergy, Gender, and Satisfaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
15

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
17
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…Job Satisfaction (JS ). The literature on work-family at times implicitly assumes that work is constrained to a typical 8-5 schedule [ 23 ], which unfortunately is in contrast to circumstances in the lives of academic faculty. Work-family conflict can have a negative bearing on job satisfaction [ 24 ].…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Job Satisfaction (JS ). The literature on work-family at times implicitly assumes that work is constrained to a typical 8-5 schedule [ 23 ], which unfortunately is in contrast to circumstances in the lives of academic faculty. Work-family conflict can have a negative bearing on job satisfaction [ 24 ].…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The family-friendly policy is cited as an organization's 'formal or informal set of terms and conditions which are designed to enable an employee to combine their family responsibilities with employment' (1998, p. 587). Family-friendly policy per se may not necessarily reduce work-family conflict (Beutell & O'Hare, 2018;Kossek et al, 2006) as the policy may not be enacted, utilization constraints existed (Beutell & O'Hare, 2018;Kirby & Krone, 2002;Kossek & Lautsch, 2012), and lack of willingness of beneficiary to utilize them which may due to the fear of the negative impact on their career advancement and rewards (Hayman, 2009). Besides, the ineffectiveness of the established work-family policy could be derived from the incongruence with the employees' work-family boundary preference and their diverse needs (Beutell & O'Hare, 2018;McNamara et al, 2013;Shockley & Allen, 2010).…”
Section: Family-friendly Policy Work-family Boundary Management and Work-family Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Family-friendly policy per se may not necessarily reduce work-family conflict (Beutell & O'Hare, 2018;Kossek et al, 2006) as the policy may not be enacted, utilization constraints existed (Beutell & O'Hare, 2018;Kirby & Krone, 2002;Kossek & Lautsch, 2012), and lack of willingness of beneficiary to utilize them which may due to the fear of the negative impact on their career advancement and rewards (Hayman, 2009). Besides, the ineffectiveness of the established work-family policy could be derived from the incongruence with the employees' work-family boundary preference and their diverse needs (Beutell & O'Hare, 2018;McNamara et al, 2013;Shockley & Allen, 2010). The recent study depicted that individuals who experience greater workfamily conflict when work and home boundaries are violated as the boundary violations hinder one from meeting the work goal and also resulted in greater negative effect (Hunter et al, 2017).…”
Section: Family-friendly Policy Work-family Boundary Management and Work-family Conflictmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, compared to those with regular work shifts, workers with irregular shifts report more stress (Golden & Kim, 2017). Irregular work shifts also predict difficulties with balancing work and family roles, including work–family conflict and work‐to‐family interference, especially for women (Beutell & O'Hare, 2018; Golden & Kim, 2017). Finally, unpredictable work schedules are linked to unstable child care arrangements (Carrillo, Harknett, Logan, Luhr, & Schneider, 2017).…”
Section: Theoretical Linkages Between Parents' Work Schedule Unpredicmentioning
confidence: 99%