2021
DOI: 10.1002/fee.2298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Working across space and time: nonstationarity in ecological research and application

Abstract: This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
97
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
97
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Statistical approaches that are insensitive to nonstationarity are important to macrosystems biologists as well as to the broader community of ecologists faced with similar statistical problems, and as such, Rollinson et al . (2021) summarize challenges and solutions relevant to all ecologists. Similarly, Zipkin et al .…”
Section: Macrosystems Is Developing As a Scientific Disciplinementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Statistical approaches that are insensitive to nonstationarity are important to macrosystems biologists as well as to the broader community of ecologists faced with similar statistical problems, and as such, Rollinson et al . (2021) summarize challenges and solutions relevant to all ecologists. Similarly, Zipkin et al .…”
Section: Macrosystems Is Developing As a Scientific Disciplinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The articles included in this Special Issue also discuss how macrosystems research can be integrated with and enriches other fields of study, for example by addressing the challenges associated with nonstationarity (a stochastic process whose unconditional joint probability distribution is a function of time), combining data across scales, and training large collaborative groups. Nonstationarity is a common feature of ecological systems as they change over time, violating statistical assumptions, and is particularly a problem in analyses of large spatial scale data (Rollinson et al 2021). Statistical approaches that are insensitive to nonstationarity are important to macrosystems biologists as well as to the broader community of ecologists faced with similar statistical problems, and as such, Rollinson et al (2021) summarize challenges and solutions relevant to all ecologists.…”
Section: Macrosystems Is Developing As a Scientific Disciplinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this time of rapid environmental change, forecasts respond to the imperative need to provide society with the best-available information to inform environmental decision making (Clark, 2001). The nonstationary, no-analog nature of many environmental changes makes the need for forecasts particularly important as traditional management approaches rely on historical norms that may no longer be relevant (Milly et al, 2008;Rollinson et al, 2021). Iterative forecasts, which can be tested and updated on decision relevant timescales, are a particularly pressing need, made possible in many domains by increases in data volume, openness, and speed (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Either way, these models rarely test the sensitivity of their results to these assumptions. Although uncertainty about the rate of ecological acclimation has been recognized [20][21][22][23] , to our knowledge its magnitude, and its consequences for ecosystem services, remains unknown.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we need better information about the rate of ecological acclimation. Other recent studies have also emphasized the need for a better understanding of rates of ecological change 23,46 . We do not need precision; even estimates of such rates to the nearest order of magnitude could greatly reduce the uncertainty of long-term projections such as ours by identifying the appropriate climate reference period, or by informing a model weighting approach 22 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%