2019
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-019-01727-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Working-memory disruption by task-irrelevant talkers depends on degree of talker familiarity

Abstract: When one is listening, familiarity with an attended talker's voice improves speech comprehension. Here, we instead investigated the effect of familiarity with a distracting talker. In an irrelevant-speech task, we assessed listeners' working memory for the serial order of spoken digits when a task-irrelevant, distracting sentence was produced by either a familiar or an unfamiliar talker (with rare omissions of the task-irrelevant sentence). We tested two groups of listeners using the same experimental procedur… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings are furthermore likely to be relevant beyond voice identity perception: For example, a large body of literature suggests that voice identity perception and speech comprehension are fundamentally linked by showing enhanced intelligibility of speech produced by a familiar versus unfamiliar voice (e.g., Nygaard & Pisoni, 1998;Johnsrude et al, 2013;Kreitewolf et al, 2017;Newman & Evers, 2007). It has been recently argued that such effects of voice familiarity on speech comprehension are due to improved acoustic representations of familiar voices (Kreitewolf et al, 2019). The current findings may be compatible with this view by suggesting that familiarity indeed affects how listeners interact with the acoustic properties of voices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Our findings are furthermore likely to be relevant beyond voice identity perception: For example, a large body of literature suggests that voice identity perception and speech comprehension are fundamentally linked by showing enhanced intelligibility of speech produced by a familiar versus unfamiliar voice (e.g., Nygaard & Pisoni, 1998;Johnsrude et al, 2013;Kreitewolf et al, 2017;Newman & Evers, 2007). It has been recently argued that such effects of voice familiarity on speech comprehension are due to improved acoustic representations of familiar voices (Kreitewolf et al, 2019). The current findings may be compatible with this view by suggesting that familiarity indeed affects how listeners interact with the acoustic properties of voices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Finally, our findings are likely to be relevant beyond voice identity perception: For example, a large body of literature suggests that voice identity perception and speech comprehension are fundamentally linked by showing enhanced intelligibility of speech produced by a familiar versus unfamiliar voice (e.g., Johnsrude et al, 2013 ; Kreitewolf et al, 2017 ; Newman & Evers, 2007 ; Nygaard & Pisoni, 1998 ). It has been recently argued that such effects of voice familiarity on speech comprehension are due to improved acoustic representations of familiar voices ( Kreitewolf, Wöstmann, Tune, Plöchl, & Obleser, 2019 ). The current findings may be compatible with this view by suggesting that familiarity indeed affects how listeners interact with the acoustic properties of voices.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to several of our previous studies [34][35][36], we followed an iterative model-fitting procedure: Starting with the minimal model that only included the subjectspecific random intercepts, we first added fixed-and then random-effects terms in a step-wise fashion. Fixedeffect terms were added in the order of their clinical importance (i.e., diagnosis, vestibular symptoms, surface, eyes, and interactions between these factors).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%