2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2007.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Working memory impairments in first-episode psychosis and chronic schizophrenia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants responded the fastest in the detection task, followed by the 1-back (p = 0.015) and 2-back tasks (p < 0.001), independent of their diagnoses (Table 2). In line with a widely accepted hypothesis, 37,38 performance in the 2-back task was affected by first-episode psychosis (p = 0.005). It is, however, noteworthy that even during the 2-back task, patients with first-episode psychosis responded correctly in more than 92% of the trials.…”
Section: Behavioural Datasupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Participants responded the fastest in the detection task, followed by the 1-back (p = 0.015) and 2-back tasks (p < 0.001), independent of their diagnoses (Table 2). In line with a widely accepted hypothesis, 37,38 performance in the 2-back task was affected by first-episode psychosis (p = 0.005). It is, however, noteworthy that even during the 2-back task, patients with first-episode psychosis responded correctly in more than 92% of the trials.…”
Section: Behavioural Datasupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Patients with SZ may fail to recruit the DLPFC during the WM tasks [52], which may reflect poor integration of neural networks or individual differences in performance and/or motivation [53]. Many confounding factors, such as medication and disease chronicity/duration [52,54,55], may also influence neural alterations in WM processing in SZ patients; therefore, it is important to consider that genetic variability in healthy individuals may not always reflect the same pathological process as in clinical cases [54]. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maintenance involves retaining information in a sequential manner, manipulation deals with rearrangement of the information sequence while monitoring checks and updates the contents of WM to determine the next step in a sequential task. WM in all subsystems is impaired in first episode patients (Zanello et al, 2009) and unaffected first degree relatives (Conklin et al, 2005; Saperstein et al, 2006; Horan et al, 2008). Relatives of SZ patients perform poorly on spatial WM (Awh et al, 1998; Saperstein et al, 2006) and spatial memory capacity (O'Connor et al, 2009).…”
Section: Nature Of Neurocognitive Deficits In Young Relatives At Riskmentioning
confidence: 99%