1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0925-7535(98)00044-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Working under pressure: crisis management, pressure groups and the media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Others have shown that media reports are often inaccurate (Rogers, 1990) and have a 'command-post point of view' (Quarantelli, 1981). They distract the work of response management by making extensive demands on communication and transport facilities (Heath, 1998). They also, by 'stimulating the convergence of unneeded and nonessential material aid upon the disaster through unsolicited calls for aid' (Wenger and Quarantelli, 1989: 67), focus more on the individual helplessness thereby undermining their role as providers of public information and education (Wilkins, 1986).…”
Section: The Role Of the Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Others have shown that media reports are often inaccurate (Rogers, 1990) and have a 'command-post point of view' (Quarantelli, 1981). They distract the work of response management by making extensive demands on communication and transport facilities (Heath, 1998). They also, by 'stimulating the convergence of unneeded and nonessential material aid upon the disaster through unsolicited calls for aid' (Wenger and Quarantelli, 1989: 67), focus more on the individual helplessness thereby undermining their role as providers of public information and education (Wilkins, 1986).…”
Section: The Role Of the Mediamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pressure groups can emerge from a crisis and may include victims, stakeholders, or media. Alternatively, they can be formed before crises to warn the public about certain issues (Heath, 1998). Pressure groups can range from formal advocacy groups to individuals on social media and attempt to pressure firms to act in the desired way.…”
Section: Pressure Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be due to uncertainties surrounding the scandal (Coombs, 2007). This “no response” strategy’s negative effect on individuals’ attitude towards the concerned company has been statistically proven (Bradford & Garrett, 1995): consumers may interpret silence as “no comment” (Taylor & Perry, 2005), which may lead them to feel that the company is not concerned about their response or that it is concealing something (Heath, 1998).…”
Section: Theoretical Descriptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%