2020
DOI: 10.46743/2160-3715/2020.3525
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Workplace Bullying in Healthcare: A Qualitative Analysis of Bystander Experiences

Abstract: Bystander action has been proposed as a promising intervention to tackle workplace bullying, however there is a lack of in-depth qualitative research on the direct experiences of bystanders. In this paper, we developed a more comprehensive definition of bullying bystanders, and examined first person accounts from healthcare professionals who had been bystanders to workplace bullying. These perspectives highlighted factors that influence the type and the extent of support bystanders may offer to targets. Semi-s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Turning the focus to the bystanders, even though there were a few reports of bystanders intervening in an active and constructive way (Ng et al, 2020; Paul et al, 2012), the participants mainly perceived bystanders as being passive either in a constructive way by privately showing social support and empathy for the target, or in a more destructive way by ignoring or avoiding the situation (Ng et al, 2020; Paull et al, 2012). This is in line with other studies focusing on bystanders in healthcare, showing a lack of direct action by witnesses of bullying (Thompson et al, 2020, discussion). This kind of passive behavior can be explained by the more general phenomenon of not knowing how to help the victim (van Heugten, 2011; Keashly & Jagatic, 2003), not feeling responsible for intervening (Mulder et al, 2016), considering the bullying as fair treatment (Leymann, 1990; Ng et al, 2020), or not seeing the severity of the situation (Tracy et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Turning the focus to the bystanders, even though there were a few reports of bystanders intervening in an active and constructive way (Ng et al, 2020; Paul et al, 2012), the participants mainly perceived bystanders as being passive either in a constructive way by privately showing social support and empathy for the target, or in a more destructive way by ignoring or avoiding the situation (Ng et al, 2020; Paull et al, 2012). This is in line with other studies focusing on bystanders in healthcare, showing a lack of direct action by witnesses of bullying (Thompson et al, 2020, discussion). This kind of passive behavior can be explained by the more general phenomenon of not knowing how to help the victim (van Heugten, 2011; Keashly & Jagatic, 2003), not feeling responsible for intervening (Mulder et al, 2016), considering the bullying as fair treatment (Leymann, 1990; Ng et al, 2020), or not seeing the severity of the situation (Tracy et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As an approach to reducing workplace bullying in the healthcare sector, focusing on bystander behavior has been identified as a promising intervention strategy (Illing et al, 2013). This is especially relevant in the healthcare context where employees are encouraged to speak up when critical incidents and errors are witnessed (Okuyama et al, 2014; Thompson et al., 2020). However, for bystander intervention to succeed, it is vital to establish a safe and supportive workplace and to ensure the engagement of management in the issue.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Still, there is need for research that evaluates bystander intervention training relative to contextual barriers to training transfer (e.g. Thompson et al, 2020). This study answers recent calls for more evidence-based bystander training research (e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%