Worlds apart? A scoping review addressing different stakeholder perspectives on barriers to family involvement in the care for persons with severe mental illness

Abstract

Background: Empirical evidence shows that family involvement (FI) can play a pivotal role in the coping and recovery of persons with severe mental illness (SMI). Nevertheless, various studies demonstrate that FI in mental healthcare services is often not (sufficiently) realized. In order to develop more insights, this scoping review gives an overview of how various stakeholders conceptualize, perceive and experience barriers to FI. Central questions are: 1) What are the main barriers to FI reported by the different key stakeholders (i.e. the persons with SMI, their families and the professionals, and 2) What are the differences and similarities between the various stakeholders' perspectives on these barriers. Methods: A systematic search into primary studies regarding FI was conducted in four databases: Medline/ Pubmed, Cinahl, PsychInfo and Web of Knowledge with the use of a PICO scheme. Thematic analysis focused on stakeholder perspectives (i.e. which stakeholder group reports the barrier) and types of barriers (i.e. which types of barriers are addressed). Results: Thirty three studies were included. The main barriers reported by the stakeholder groups reveal important similarities and differences between the stakeholder groups and were related to: 1) the person with SMI, 2) the family, 3) the professionals, 4) the organization of care and 5) the culture-paradigm. Discussion: Our stakeholder approach elicits the different stakeholders' concepts, presuppositions and experiences of barriers to FI, and gives fundamental insights on how to deal with barriers to FI. The stakeholders differing interpretations and perceptions of the barriers related to FI is closely related to the inherent complexity involved in FI in itself. In order to deal better with these barriers, openly discussing and reflecting upon each other's normative understandings of barriers is needed. Conclusions: Differences in perceptions of barriers to FI can itself be a barrier. To deal with barriers to FI, a dialogical approach on how the different stakeholders perceive and value FI and its barriers is required. Methods such as moral case deliberation or systematic ethics reflections can be useful.

Living with personality disorder and seeking mental health treatment: patients and family members reflect on their experiences

“…Carers also focussed on being involved in the assessment and treatment of the consumers they support, although consumers did not mention this. While carer involvement in assessment and intervention is important to carers and may help them support consumers [46], the perspective of consumers should be considered because not all consumers endorse family or friend involvement in their care [47,48]. In addition, carers focussed on improving support for carers, including having mental health professionals checking in on carers.…”

Family‐focused practice with EASE: A practice framework for strengthening recovery when mental health consumers are parents

“…Landeweer et al . ) can be addressed through clear operational definitions and practice specifications, and careful and considered development of workforce training foci and strategies (Biebel et al . ; Fixsen et al .…”

Sharing Care Responsibilities Between Professionals and Personal Networks in Mental Healthcare: A Plea for Inclusion

“…Moreover, not all families are necessarily warm or caring toward each other (Pols 2016). Besides, it is not always clear who are recognized as members of the personal network and people with mental health problems may not want to involve their personal networks although they may provide care (Landeweer et al 2017).…”