Working Poverty in Europe 2011
DOI: 10.1057/9780230307599_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Worlds of Working Poverty: National Variations in Mechanisms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
24
0
9

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
24
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Their idea is that there is a large number of macro-and micro-level working poverty factors identified in the literature, but that there are only three mechanisms that lead to working poverty, namely low earnings per unit of time, a belowaverage degree of labour force attachment at the household level and the number of children per working-age adult. The relative weight of each working poverty mechanism varies across welfare regimes (Crettaz and Bonoli, 2011). Their model, refined in Crettaz (2011a), is depicted in Figure 1.…”
Section: Theoretical Models Used In the Literature On Working Povertymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their idea is that there is a large number of macro-and micro-level working poverty factors identified in the literature, but that there are only three mechanisms that lead to working poverty, namely low earnings per unit of time, a belowaverage degree of labour force attachment at the household level and the number of children per working-age adult. The relative weight of each working poverty mechanism varies across welfare regimes (Crettaz and Bonoli, 2011). Their model, refined in Crettaz (2011a), is depicted in Figure 1.…”
Section: Theoretical Models Used In the Literature On Working Povertymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Las variables independientes que se han introducido en el modelo se corresponden con los factores que las investigaciones anteriores han identificado como determinantes en la pobreza laboral (Cretazz 2011;Goerne 2010;Gutiérrez et al 2011). Por un lado, se ha observado el efecto de la edad, el sexo, la educación y el estado civil.…”
Section: Resultados Analíticosunclassified
“…La dimensión de pobreza se mide desde una perspectiva monetaria y relativa y se han identificado como pobres a aquellos hogares cuya renta equivalente está por debajo del 60 % de la renta mediana equivalente. Sin embargo, no hay consenso claro en la literatura sobre cómo conceptualizar la dimensión del trabajo (Peñas-Casas y Latta 2004;Ponthieux 2010;Cretazz 2011). Los principales indicadores se diferencian por el grado de participación en el mercado laboral requerido para incluir a las personas en la categoría de trabajadoras y la selección de un indicador u otro influirá tanto en la determinación del tamaño del fenómeno de la pobreza laboral como en la identificación de sus causas (Peñas-Casas y Latta 2004; Ponthieux 2010).…”
Section: Conceptos Datos Y Metodologíaunclassified
“…Some comparative in-work poverty studies (Airio, 2008;Brady et al, 2010;Crettaz, 2011;Crettaz and Bonoli, 2010b;O'Connor and Smeeding, 1996) use the Luxemburg Income Study (LIS). The LIS currently covers 30 countries in Europe, America, Asia and Oceania and provides data from the early 1980s.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%