Worldwide Usage of International Classification of Primary Care

Abstract

To describe the worldwide use of the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC) and other classifications in primary care settings and to identify details of ICPC use in each country. Methods: A research survey with a questionnaire requiring self-completion was emailed to members of the WONCA International Classification Committee (WICC) and family physicians (FP) from each country recognized by the United Nations (UN). Results: We obtained the e-mail addresses of representatives from 109 countries and received 61 responses (out of 259 requests sent) to the questionnaire from 52 different countries; 30 were obtained from Europe, 8 from Asia, 7 from America, 6 from Africa, and 1 from Oceania. In 34 countries (17%), a version of ICPC was available in a national language. ICPC was used in primary care setting in 27 countries (14%), but it was a mandatory standard in only 6 (3%). Assessment of the topics accounted for in the clinical records showed that 10 countries used ICPC to classify the patient’s reasons for encounter and diagnosis, while just 5 countries used ICPC to classify the patient’s reasons for encounter, diagnosis, and processes of care. Of the 24 countries responding that the use of ICPC for clinical records was not promoted in primary care, 19 used the 10th edition of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD), 3 used other classifications, and 2 did not use any classification. Conclusions: Although the response rate to the questionnaire was low, we concluded that ICPC use is not widespread globally. Even for those countries reporting the use of ICPC in primary care, it is usually not a mandatory standard.

Professional Factors Associated with Case Resolution without Referrals of Orofacial Pain Cases to Secondary Dental Care by Telehealth in Brazil: A Cross-Sectional Study in 2019 and 2020

“…The last one deals with the reasons for demands beyond the apparent diseases, allowing a better understanding of PHC user problems and perceptions. It is a complementary tool to the traditional ICD and has been gradually recognized as an appropriate classification for family medicine and primary care [ 21 ].…”

The revision of the categories of mood, anxiety and stress-related disorders in the ICD-11: a perspective from the Arab region

“…The International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition (ICD-10) Primary Health Care Version (ICD-10 PHC) published by the WHO is the primary care version of the ICD-10 dedicated to that purpose [63]. In practice, despite this effort, doubts remain over their level of utilization [6]. Further engagement of primary care workers, whether from a medical background or from other disciplines, in the development of new classification systems is desirable [48].…”

Reliability and validity of ICPC-2-R encoding by medical students

“…during their clinical clerkship or internship in primary care, either to quantitatively report their activity to the medical school or to comply with the service routines (e. g. because of adoption in Brazil's public health system). 9 Our objective was to estimate how reliably and validly can medical students encode reasons for encounter and diagnoses using the revised 2 nd edition of the ICPC (ICPC-2-R).…”