2018
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01353
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Worth Less?: Why Men (and Women) Devalue Care-Oriented Careers

Abstract: In the present research, we applied a goal-congruity perspective – the proposition that men and women seek out roles that afford their internalized values (Diekman et al., 2017) – to better understand the degree to which careers in healthcare, early education, and domestic roles (HEED; Croft et al., 2015) are devalued in society. Our first goal was to test the hypothesis that men, relative to women, are less interested in pursuing HEED careers in part because they are less likely than women to endorse communal… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
(87 reference statements)
1
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such qualities are therefore viewed as incompatible with the communal group-serving values that women (more than men) appear to endorse (Diekman et al, 2015). Analogously, evidence points to men avoiding communal group-serving environments (e.g., healthcare, early education, and domestic work) because these careers are viewed as incompatible with both the status-based and self-serving values that men (more than women) appear to endorse (Block et al, 2018).…”
Section: Differences In Preferences Values or Lifestyle Choicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such qualities are therefore viewed as incompatible with the communal group-serving values that women (more than men) appear to endorse (Diekman et al, 2015). Analogously, evidence points to men avoiding communal group-serving environments (e.g., healthcare, early education, and domestic work) because these careers are viewed as incompatible with both the status-based and self-serving values that men (more than women) appear to endorse (Block et al, 2018).…”
Section: Differences In Preferences Values or Lifestyle Choicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As noted, one of the main drivers of male engagement in communal roles are gender norms socializing men to be less communal than women (Martin & Ruble, ; Wood & Eagly, ). Boys’ and men's relatively lower communal values have been shown to explain lower family aspirations in young boys, as well as lower interest in HEED careers in men (Block, Croft, & Schmader, ; Block, Gonzalez, Schmader, & Baron, ). In order to reduce barriers to men's communal engagement then, the most basic and necessary level is to start early, with less gender‐rigid socialization of boys.…”
Section: Tackling Barriers To Men's Communal Engagement At the Societmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These findings can be explained by work showing that general and partner-specific communal motivation are linked to increased positive emotions in daily life (Le, Impett, Kogan, Webster, and Cheng 2012), greater feelings of authenticity when caring for others (Kogan et al 2010;Le and Impett 2015), and decreased perceptions of costs involved in caring for a partner (Day, Muise, Joel, and Impett 2015). Regarding gender differences, although men may experience barriers, devalue, and have misconceptions about taking on communal roles (Block, Croft, and Schmader 2018;Croft, Schmader, and Block 2015; Van Grootel, Van Laar, Meeussen, Schmader, and Sczesny 2018), the well-being benefits linked to communal motivation are observed in both men and women (Le, Impett, Lemay, Muise, and Tskhay 2018). Importantly, communal motivation is linked to greater personal well-being for the self and relationship partners only to the extent that people do not lose sight of their own needs.…”
Section: Building and Maintaining Relationshipsmentioning
confidence: 99%